FTLSvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-1.21%
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. FTLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.38%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. FTLS is up 8.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$312M in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with 10.85% YTD performance, and +$311M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTLS and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FTLS vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTLS QDPL | +0.39%-0.94% | +3.68%+1.75% | +8.97%+10.85% | +9.13%+11.57% | +52.19%+79.62% | +62.80%+68.91% |
| Flows | FTLS QDPL | +$85M+$26M | +$123M+$114M | +$312M+$311M | +$397M+$404M | +$1.35B+$1.38B | +$1.62B+$1.53B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTLS QDPL | +6.14%+9.99% | +7.13%+11.76% | +8.67%+13.51% | +9.40%+15.37% |
| Max drawdown | FTLS QDPL | -1.81%-2.92% | -3.80%-8.32% | -11.43%-17.47% | -11.43%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | FTLS QDPL | 16d24d | 65d70d | 214d126d | 214d704d |
Trading data
FTLS | QDPL | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $75.66 | $45.06 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $76.42 | $45.22 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTLS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFTLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
FTLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.66 | $45.06 |
| 1D performance | -0.99% | -0.35% |
| AuM | $2.66 B | $1.82 B |
| E/R | 1.38% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
FTLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 8, 2014 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FTLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FTLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
FTLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FTLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FTLS and QDPL
How have the FTLS and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, FTLS is up 8.97% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 10.85%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTLS or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the FTLS ETF saw +$312M in flows, compared to +$311M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: FTLS or QDPL?
Over the past year, FTLS had a volatility of 7.13%, while QDPL experienced 11.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: FTLS or QDPL?
As of October 29, 2026, FTLS holds $2.66 B in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.82 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about FTLS & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
