FTAGvsMOOETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. FTAG's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. FTAG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.56% for MOO. FTAG is up 10.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. MOO performs better with 12.51% YTD performance, and +$476M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTAG and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FTAG vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTAG MOO | -6.11%-4.25% | -1.62%-0.30% | +10.35%+12.51% | +13.76%+15.52% | +17.87%+16.18% | +4.78%-1.58% |
| Flows | FTAG MOO | --$60M | -+$148M | +$7M+$476M | +$7M+$455M | +$2M+$127M | +$12M+$292M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTAG MOO | +13.05%+13.45% | +13.49%+13.94% | +14.46%+14.63% | +16.63%+16.50% |
| Max drawdown | FTAG MOO | -10.38%-9.40% | -10.38%-10.98% | -16.31%-17.98% | -32.15%-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | FTAG MOO | 42d44d | 42d193d | 228d531d | 1595d1640d |
Trading data
FTAG | MOO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.60 | $81.79 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $28.75 | $82.14 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTAG | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FTAG | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.60 | $81.79 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.43% |
| AuM | $14.04 M | $1.11 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
FTAG | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Indxx Global Agriculture Index | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 11, 2010 | August 31, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FTAG
USA
35.61%
Germany
22.15%
India
9.39%
Japan
8.44%
Other
24.41%
MOO
USA
50.98%
Germany
9.84%
Norway
7.56%
Other
31.62%
Sectors
FTAG
Non-Energy Materi.
52.48%
Industrials
24.46%
Healthcare
9.55%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Other
5.25%
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
34.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
28.69%
Industrials
21.21%
Healthcare
16.02%
Other
0%
Advertisement
Diversification
FTAG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
76.03%
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.06%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FTAG
Deere & Co.
10.44%
Corteva, Inc.
10.06%
Bayer AG
9.55%
BASF SE
9.43%
Nutrien Ltd.
4.74%
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
4.43%
Kubota Corp.
4.04%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
3.94%
Bunge Global SA
3.87%
Wilmar International Ltd.
3.58%
Industries of Qatar Co.
3.14%
CNH Industrial NV
2.93%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.18%
Evonik Industries AG
1.93%
The Toro Co.
1.77%
MOO
Bayer AG
8.83%
Corteva, Inc.
8.24%
Deere & Co.
8.24%
Nutrien Ltd.
6.72%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.22%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.05%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.74%
Kubota Corp.
4.62%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
3.93%
Bunge Global SA
3.40%
Mowi ASA
3.08%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.68%
CNH Industrial NV
2.49%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.45%
Yara International ASA
2.39%
Frequently asked questions about FTAG and MOO
How have the FTAG and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, FTAG is up 10.35% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 12.51%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTAG or MOO?
Year-to-date, the FTAG ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$476M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: FTAG or MOO?
Over the past year, FTAG had a volatility of 13.49%, while MOO experienced 13.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: FTAG or MOO?
As of October 15, 2026, FTAG holds $14.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $1.11 B.
What sectors do the FTAG and MOO ETFs invest in?
FTAG leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FTAG ETF and MOO ETF?
FTAG top holdings include Deere & Co., Corteva, Inc. and Bayer AG. MOO holds in its top three: Bayer AG, Corteva, Inc. and Deere & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: FTAG or MOO?
FTAG holds 50 securities with 76.03% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.06%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FTAG & MOO
Advertisement
