FTAGvsCGWETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. FTAG's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. FTAG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.59% for CGW. FTAG is up 10.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 2.4% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTAG and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FTAG vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTAG CGW | -6.11%+1.78% | -1.62%-2.39% | +10.35%+2.40% | +13.76%+1.32% | +17.87%+45.35% | +4.78%+22.53% |
| Flows | FTAG CGW | --$358K | --$358K | +$7M+$41M | +$7M+$46M | +$2M-$130M | +$12M-$200M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTAG CGW | +13.05%+11.88% | +13.49%+13.06% | +14.46%+13.64% | +16.63%+15.73% |
| Max drawdown | FTAG CGW | -10.38%-7.04% | -10.38%-10.52% | -16.31%-14.42% | -32.15%-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | FTAG CGW | 42d72d | 42d232d | 228d227d | 1595d862d |
Trading data
FTAG | CGW | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.60 | $64.10 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $28.75 | $64.02 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTAG | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FTAG | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.60 | $64.10 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | +0.12% |
| AuM | $14.04 M | $1.04 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
FTAG | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Indxx Global Agriculture Index | S&P Global Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 66 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 11, 2010 | May 14, 2007 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FTAG
USA
35.61%
Germany
22.15%
India
9.39%
Japan
8.44%
Other
24.41%
CGW
USA
56.47%
United Kingdom
14.4%
Brazil
9.59%
Switzerland
7.03%
Other
12.51%
Sectors
FTAG
Non-Energy Materi.
52.48%
Industrials
24.46%
Healthcare
9.55%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Other
5.25%
CGW
Utilities
45.36%
Industrials
35.72%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.65%
Other
3.28%
Advertisement
Diversification
FTAG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
76.03%
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
67.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FTAG
Deere & Co.
10.44%
Corteva, Inc.
10.06%
Bayer AG
9.55%
BASF SE
9.43%
Nutrien Ltd.
4.74%
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
4.43%
Kubota Corp.
4.04%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
3.94%
Bunge Global SA
3.87%
Wilmar International Ltd.
3.58%
Industries of Qatar Co.
3.14%
CNH Industrial NV
2.93%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.18%
Evonik Industries AG
1.93%
The Toro Co.
1.77%
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
8.20%
Xylem, Inc.
7.51%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
6.77%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.80%
United Utilities Group Plc
5.75%
Severn Trent Plc
5.19%
Veralto Corp.
4.77%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.12%
Geberit AG
3.81%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.44%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.35%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.42%
American States Water Co.
2.34%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.08%
California Water Service Group
2.02%
Frequently asked questions about FTAG and CGW
How have the FTAG and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, FTAG is up 10.35% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 2.4%. That puts FTAG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTAG or CGW?
Year-to-date, the FTAG ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: FTAG or CGW?
Over the past year, FTAG had a volatility of 13.49%, while CGW experienced 13.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: FTAG or CGW?
As of October 15, 2026, FTAG holds $14.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.04 B.
What sectors do the FTAG and CGW ETFs invest in?
FTAG leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the FTAG ETF and CGW ETF?
FTAG top holdings include Deere & Co., Corteva, Inc. and Bayer AG. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.
Which ETF is more diversified: FTAG or CGW?
FTAG holds 50 securities with 76.03% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 66 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.56%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FTAG & CGW
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
CGW
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
Advertisement
