FSEPvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. FSEP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. FSEP is up 11.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$152M in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 14.8% YTD performance, and +$3.58B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSEP and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FSEP vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSEP GPIQ | +1.80%+0.59% | +3.76%+0.55% | +11.83%+14.80% | +14.57%+18.72% | +53.36%n/a | +65.52%n/a |
| Flows | FSEP GPIQ | +$145M+$613M | +$163M+$1.40B | +$152M+$3.58B | +$194M+$4.28B | +$689M- | +$940M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSEP GPIQ | +5.55%+15.72% | +7.32%+17.09% | +9.30%n/a | +11.15%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FSEP GPIQ | -1.59%-6.23% | -5.67%-9.57% | -12.62%n/a | -13.65%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FSEP GPIQ | 16d13d | 70d75d | 112dn/a | 513dn/a |
FSEP | GPIQ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $57.20 | $55.55 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $57.63 | $56.84 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FSEP | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $57.20 | $55.55 |
| 1D performance | -0.75% | -2.27% |
| AuM | $1.43 B | $6.27 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.35% |
FSEP | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 18, 2020 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
