FSCSvsEPSVETF Comparison
VS
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) and Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FSCS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, EPSV's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. FSCS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.88% for EPSV. FSCS is up 7.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$137K in YTD flows. EPSV performs better with 28.82% YTD performance, and +$751K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSCS and EPSV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FSCS vs EPSV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSCS EPSV | +4.22%-1.09% | +5.32%+9.41% | +7.67%+28.82% | +6.19%+38.03% | +33.06%n/a | +41.48%n/a |
| Flows | FSCS EPSV | -$2M- | -$2M+$751K | +$137K+$751K | +$9M+$751K | +$40M- | +$31M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSCS EPSV | +11.94%+18.32% | +12.38%+17.95% | +15.65%n/a | +17.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FSCS EPSV | -3.78%-4.37% | -7.85%-8.98% | -19.22%n/a | -21.18%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FSCS EPSV | 56d15d | 155d47d | 609dn/a | 393dn/a |
Trading data
FSCS | EPSV | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.79 | $30.08 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $38.27 | $30.81 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EPSV
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFSCS | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FSCS | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.79 | $30.08 |
| 1D performance | -1.24% | -2.38% |
| AuM | $59.31 M | $6.16 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.88% |
Characteristics
FSCS | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Harbor Capital |
| Benchmark | The SMID Capital Strength Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 60 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | May 1, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FSCS
USA
94.49%
Other
5.51%
EPSV
USA
94.07%
Other
5.93%
Sectors
FSCS
Finance
34.87%
Industrials
20.27%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.37%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.68%
Other
20.81%
EPSV
Finance
28.62%
Industrials
20.38%
Technology
19.31%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.92%
Other
22.76%
Advertisement
Diversification
FSCS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.12%
EPSV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.55%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
FSCS
A10 Networks, Inc.
1.37%
Valmont Industries, Inc.
1.35%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.25%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
1.25%
Assurant, Inc.
1.20%
Granite Construction, Inc.
1.20%
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
1.19%
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
1.18%
Globe Life, Inc.
1.18%
OFG Bancorp
1.17%
Cabot Corp.
1.16%
Interparfums, Inc.
1.16%
Incyte Corp.
1.16%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.15%
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
1.15%
EPSV
Flex Ltd.
4.56%
Moog, Inc.
4.03%
Sanmina Corp.
3.51%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
2.88%
Digi International, Inc.
2.77%
Avnet, Inc.
2.40%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.30%
Popular, Inc.
2.18%
CBRE Group, Inc.
2.18%
Performance Food Group Co.
2.11%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
1.97%
Acuity, Inc.
1.94%
Vornado Realty Trust
1.91%
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.
1.90%
Entegris, Inc.
1.90%
Frequently asked questions about FSCS and EPSV
How have the FSCS and EPSV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, FSCS is up 7.67% year-to-date (YTD), while EPSV has returned 28.82%. That puts EPSV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSCS or EPSV?
Year-to-date, the FSCS ETF saw +$137K in flows, compared to +$751K for EPSV.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSCS or EPSV?
Over the past year, FSCS had a volatility of 12.38%, while EPSV experienced 17.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSCS or EPSV?
As of July 28, 2026, FSCS holds $59.31 M in assets under management (AUM), while EPSV manages $6.16 M.
What sectors do the FSCS and EPSV ETFs invest in?
FSCS leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, EPSV focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FSCS ETF and EPSV ETF?
FSCS top holdings include A10 Networks, Inc., Valmont Industries, Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.. EPSV holds in its top three: Flex Ltd., Moog, Inc. and Sanmina Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FSCS or EPSV?
FSCS holds 100 securities with 18.12% of its assets in the top 15. EPSV has 60 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.55%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FSCS & EPSV
Advertisement
Advertisement
