FQALvsSGLCETF Comparison
VS
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FQAL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.85% for SGLC. FQAL is up 11.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$135M in YTD flows. SGLC performs better with 18.52% YTD performance, and +$71M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FQAL and SGLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FQAL vs SGLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/08/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FQAL SGLC | -1.13%-0.89% | +5.23%+5.77% | +11.79%+18.52% | +16.22%+26.90% | +70.27%+78.53% | +71.51%n/a |
| Flows | FQAL SGLC | -$5M+$4M | -$25M+$11M | +$135M+$71M | +$154M+$72M | +$620M+$55M | +$738M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FQAL SGLC | +10.21%+13.39% | +11.42%+14.11% | +13.97%+15.69% | +16.31%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FQAL SGLC | -2.22%-3.37% | -8.44%-10.17% | -16.70%-19.49% | -25.39%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FQAL SGLC | 16d16d | 50d74d | 126d174d | 750dn/a |
Trading data
FQAL | SGLC | |
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM | $83.47 | $45.28 |
| Previous close 09/08/2026 | $83.96 | $45.45 |
| Consolidated volume 09/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SGLC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFQAL | SGLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FQAL | SGLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $83.47 | $45.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.58% | -0.36% |
| AuM | $1.44 B | $214.23 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
FQAL | SGLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Fidelity | Summit Global Investments |
| Benchmark | Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 124 | 424 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2016 | March 31, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FQAL
USA
97.73%
Other
2.27%
SGLC
USA
98.95%
Other
1.05%
Sectors
FQAL
Technology
42.52%
Finance
13.54%
Healthcare
9.52%
Industrials
7.72%
Other
26.71%
SGLC
Technology
43.53%
Finance
17.02%
Healthcare
9.8%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.65%
Other
21%
Advertisement
Diversification
FQAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.26%
SGLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FQAL
Apple, Inc.
7.97%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.57%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.25%
Microsoft Corp.
4.77%
Broadcom Inc.
3.29%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.03%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.02%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.88%
Visa, Inc.
1.49%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.46%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.44%
Johnson & Johnson
1.42%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.24%
Lam Research Corp.
1.21%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.21%
SGLC
NVIDIA Corp.
8.08%
Apple, Inc.
7.15%
Microsoft Corp.
4.74%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.82%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.39%
Broadcom Inc.
3.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.75%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.61%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.53%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.27%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.08%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
1.99%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.76%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.67%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.62%
Frequently asked questions about FQAL and SGLC
How have the FQAL and SGLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 8, 2026, FQAL is up 11.79% year-to-date (YTD), while SGLC has returned 18.52%. That puts SGLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FQAL or SGLC?
Year-to-date, the FQAL ETF saw +$135M in flows, compared to +$71M for SGLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: FQAL or SGLC?
Over the past year, FQAL had a volatility of 11.42%, while SGLC experienced 14.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: FQAL or SGLC?
As of September 8, 2026, FQAL holds $1.44 B in assets under management (AUM), while SGLC manages $214.23 M.
What sectors do the FQAL and SGLC ETFs invest in?
FQAL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, SGLC focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FQAL ETF and SGLC ETF?
FQAL top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Alphabet, Inc.. SGLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FQAL or SGLC?
FQAL holds 124 securities with 44.26% of its assets in the top 15. SGLC has 426 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.49%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FQAL & SGLC
Advertisement
