FQALvsIWBETF Comparison
VS
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Both FQAL and IWB have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%. FQAL is up 12.1% year-to-date (YTD) with +$198M in YTD flows. IWB performs worse with 11.99% YTD performance, and -$2.80B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FQAL and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FQAL vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FQAL IWB | +0.28%-0.95% | +3.61%+3.06% | +12.10%+11.99% | +14.23%+13.75% | +79.25%+86.19% | +69.64%+72.08% |
| Flows | FQAL IWB | +$68M-$104M | +$55M-$660M | +$198M-$2.80B | +$198M-$1.04B | +$686M-$2.93B | +$794M-$2.80B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FQAL IWB | +8.99%+11.14% | +11.29%+12.89% | +13.83%+15.13% | +16.22%+17.29% |
| Max drawdown | FQAL IWB | -3.20%-3.22% | -8.44%-8.86% | -16.70%-19.16% | -25.39%-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | FQAL IWB | 71d53d | 50d76d | 126d126d | 750d709d |
Trading data
FQAL | IWB | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $83.98 | $415.35 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $84.61 | $417.25 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FQAL | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FQAL | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $83.98 | $415.35 |
| 1D performance | -0.75% | -0.46% |
| AuM | $1.50 B | $48.38 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.15% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FQAL
USA
97.15%
Other
2.85%
IWB
USA
97.62%
Other
2.38%
Sectors
FQAL
Technology
44.1%
Finance
13.77%
Healthcare
9.65%
Other
32.48%
IWB
Technology
42.97%
Finance
14.31%
Healthcare
9.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.59%
Industrials
8.08%
Other
16.72%
Diversification
FQAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.59%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FQAL
NVIDIA Corp.
7.91%
Apple, Inc.
7.17%
Microsoft Corp.
5.88%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
3.02%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.18%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.92%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.91%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.65%
Visa, Inc.
1.47%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.42%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.29%
Johnson & Johnson
1.29%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.22%
Lam Research Corp.
1.17%
IWB
NVIDIA Corp.
7.26%
Apple, Inc.
6.45%
Microsoft Corp.
5.31%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.79%
Broadcom Inc.
2.43%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.25%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.77%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.52%
Tesla, Inc.
1.51%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.34%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.32%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.30%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.08%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.94%
Frequently asked questions about FQAL and IWB
How have the FQAL and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, FQAL is up 12.1% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 11.99%. That puts FQAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FQAL or IWB?
Year-to-date, the FQAL ETF saw +$198M in flows, compared to -$2.80B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: FQAL or IWB?
Over the past year, FQAL had a volatility of 11.29%, while IWB experienced 12.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: FQAL or IWB?
As of October 23, 2026, FQAL holds $1.50 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $48.38 B.
What sectors do the FQAL and IWB ETFs invest in?
FQAL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FQAL ETF and IWB ETF?
FQAL top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FQAL or IWB?
FQAL holds 132 securities with 44.59% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1018 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.83%.
Latest news about FQAL & IWB
Advertisement
