Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FQALvsILCBETF Comparison
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) is part of the US Large Cap segment. FQAL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, ILCB's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. FQAL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.03% for ILCB. FQAL is down -1.69% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. ILCB performs worse with -2.47% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FQAL and ILCB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FQAL vs ILCB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FQAL ILCB | -2.24%-2.20% | -1.29%-2.23% | -1.69%-2.47% | +17.51%+20.44% | +72.83%+80.52% | +77.19%+77.09% |
| Flows | FQAL ILCB | +$108K-$137K | +$12M-$248K | +$8M-$5M | -$51M+$11M | +$527M-$67M | +$616M-$210M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FQAL ILCB | +11.41%+12.25% | +16.80%+18.50% | +13.97%+15.03% | +16.22%+17.17% |
| Max drawdown | FQAL ILCB | -4.10%-4.42% | -12.41%-13.93% | -16.70%-19.10% | -25.39%-25.46% |
| Max drawdown duration | FQAL ILCB | 15d44d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 750d715d |
FQAL | ILCB | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 5:10 PM | $74.08 | $91.99 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $74.29 | $93.44 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FQAL | ILCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FQAL | ILCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.08 | $91.99 |
| 1D performance | -0.29% | -1.55% |
| AuM | $1.14 B | $1.14 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.03% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FQAL and ILCB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FQAL is down -1.69% year-to-date (YTD), while ILCB has lost -2.47%. That puts FQAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FQAL or ILCB?
Year-to-date, the FQAL ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to -$5M for ILCB.
Which ETF is more volatile: FQAL or ILCB?
Over the past year, FQAL had a volatility of 16.8%, while ILCB experienced 18.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: FQAL or ILCB?
As of March 12, 2026, FQAL holds $1.14 B in assets under management (AUM), while ILCB manages $1.14 B.
What sectors do the FQAL and ILCB ETFs invest in?
FQAL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, ILCB focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FQAL ETF and ILCB ETF?
FQAL top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ILCB holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FQAL or ILCB?
FQAL holds 124 securities with 45.59% of its assets in the top 15. ILCB has 535 securities and a top 15 weight of 43%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
