Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FQALvsBBUSETF Comparison
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) is part of the US Large Cap segment. FQAL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, BBUS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. FQAL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.02% for BBUS. FQAL is up 0.08% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. BBUS performs worse with -1.03% YTD performance, and +$468M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FQAL and BBUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FQAL vs BBUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FQAL BBUS | -1.88%-2.21% | -0.12%-1.63% | +0.08%-1.03% | +18.68%+22.04% | +75.06%+83.23% | +82.42%+82.44% |
| Flows | FQAL BBUS | +$108K+$62M | +$15M+$616M | +$8M+$468M | -$57M+$2.11B | +$527M+$4.08B | +$616M+$5.08B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FQAL BBUS | +11.30%+11.61% | +16.77%+18.33% | +13.96%+14.94% | +16.21%+17.10% |
| Max drawdown | FQAL BBUS | -2.75%-3.50% | -12.41%-13.90% | -16.70%-19.04% | -25.39%-25.46% |
| Max drawdown duration | FQAL BBUS | 13d42d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 750d715d |
FQAL | BBUS | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.39 | $121.91 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $75.71 | $122.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FQAL | BBUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FQAL | BBUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.39 | $121.91 |
| 1D performance | -0.42% | -0.09% |
| AuM | $1.16 B | $7.16 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.02% |
FQAL | BBUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index | Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index |
| N° of holdings | 119 | 461 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2016 | March 12, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FQAL and BBUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FQAL is up 0.08% year-to-date (YTD), while BBUS has lost -1.03%. That puts FQAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FQAL or BBUS?
Year-to-date, the FQAL ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to +$468M for BBUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FQAL or BBUS?
Over the past year, FQAL had a volatility of 16.77%, while BBUS experienced 18.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: FQAL or BBUS?
As of March 10, 2026, FQAL holds $1.16 B in assets under management (AUM), while BBUS manages $7.16 B.
What sectors do the FQAL and BBUS ETFs invest in?
FQAL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, BBUS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FQAL ETF and BBUS ETF?
FQAL top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. BBUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FQAL or BBUS?
FQAL holds 124 securities with 45.59% of its assets in the top 15. BBUS has 491 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.79%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
