FPWRvsIGFETF Comparison
VS
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. FPWR's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, IGF's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. FPWR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.96%, versus 0.37% for IGF. FPWR is up 13.57% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. IGF performs worse with 6.81% YTD performance, and +$1.39B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FPWR and IGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FPWR vs IGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FPWR IGF | +5.70%+3.78% | -2.60%-3.78% | +13.57%+6.81% | +11.69%+8.08% | +77.16%+71.68% | +69.07%+57.12% |
| Flows | FPWR IGF | +$2M+$185M | +$5M+$160M | +$13M+$1.39B | +$13M+$1.82B | -$8M+$5.24B | +$5M+$5.81B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FPWR IGF | +11.43%+9.96% | +11.41%+10.67% | +12.87%+11.68% | +14.40%+13.31% |
| Max drawdown | FPWR IGF | -9.29%-9.16% | -9.56%-10.51% | -9.56%-10.51% | -18.90%-20.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | FPWR IGF | 92d89d | 176d236d | 176d236d | 694d747d |
Trading data
FPWR | IGF | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.14 | $64.70 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $36.78 | $64.65 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FPWR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFPWR | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FPWR | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.14 | $64.70 |
| 1D performance | +0.98% | +0.08% |
| AuM | $33.11 M | $10.77 B |
| E/R | 0.96% | 0.37% |
Characteristics
FPWR | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 58 | 75 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2019 | December 10, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FPWR
USA
87.34%
Other
12.66%
IGF
USA
37.55%
Spain
9.54%
Canada
8.25%
Australia
7.48%
Other
37.18%
Sectors
FPWR
Utilities
55.44%
Energy
32.42%
Other
12.14%
IGF
Utilities
39.58%
Industrials
38.79%
Energy
21.13%
Other
0.5%
Advertisement
Diversification
FPWR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.84%
IGF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
51.31%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FPWR
Energy Transfer LP
5.14%
Enterprise Products Partners LP
4.87%
National Fuel Gas Co.
3.75%
Duke Energy Corp.
3.42%
PPL Corp.
3.15%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
3.07%
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
2.91%
MPLX LP
2.80%
WEC Energy Group, Inc.
2.80%
Xcel Energy, Inc.
2.68%
The Southern Co.
2.58%
IDACORP, Inc.
2.56%
Evergy, Inc.
2.41%
Entergy Corp.
2.38%
ONE Gas, Inc.
2.32%
IGF
Transurban Group Ltd.
5.47%
Aena S.M.E. SA
5.43%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
4.75%
Iberdrola SA
4.11%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.92%
Auckland International Airport Ltd.
3.53%
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico SAB de CV
3.35%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
3.25%
The Southern Co.
2.75%
Getlink SE
2.73%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.64%
Constellation Energy Corp.
2.43%
Enel SpA
2.40%
TC Energy Corp.
2.31%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
2.24%
Frequently asked questions about FPWR and IGF
How have the FPWR and IGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, FPWR is up 13.57% year-to-date (YTD), while IGF has returned 6.81%. That puts FPWR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FPWR or IGF?
Year-to-date, the FPWR ETF saw +$13M in flows, compared to +$1.39B for IGF.
Which ETF is more volatile: FPWR or IGF?
Over the past year, FPWR had a volatility of 11.41%, while IGF experienced 10.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: FPWR or IGF?
As of October 23, 2026, FPWR holds $33.11 M in assets under management (AUM), while IGF manages $10.77 B.
What sectors do the FPWR and IGF ETFs invest in?
FPWR leans toward sectors like Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, IGF focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the FPWR ETF and IGF ETF?
FPWR top holdings include Energy Transfer LP, Enterprise Products Partners LP and National Fuel Gas Co.. IGF holds in its top three: Transurban Group Ltd., Aena S.M.E. SA and NextEra Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FPWR or IGF?
FPWR holds 58 securities with 46.84% of its assets in the top 15. IGF has 75 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.31%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FPWR & IGF
Advertisement
