Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FOWFvsXLIETF Comparison
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI) is part of the US Industrials segment. FOWF's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Communication Services. In contrast, XLI's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology FOWF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.08% for XLI. FOWF is up 8.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. XLI performs worse with 6.56% YTD performance, and +$1.43B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FOWF and XLI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FOWF vs XLI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FOWF XLI | +0.50%-4.35% | +9.16%+5.79% | +8.26%+6.56% | +35.76%+28.71% | n/a+75.69% | n/a+84.26% |
| Flows | FOWF XLI | +$5M-$155M | +$7M+$1.67B | +$6M+$1.43B | +$12M+$3.17B | -+$5.09B | -+$106M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FOWF XLI | +14.50%+16.91% | +16.02%+19.29% | n/a+16.01% | n/a+17.20% |
| Max drawdown | FOWF XLI | -3.75%-7.65% | -12.32%-13.44% | n/a-18.43% | n/a-21.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | FOWF XLI | 10d10d | 35d37d | n/a165d | n/a526d |
FOWF | XLI | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $164.65 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $165.24 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FOWF | XLI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FOWF | XLI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $164.65 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.36% |
| AuM | $14.27 M | $28.64 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.08% |
FOWF | XLI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index | S&P Industrial Select Sector Index |
| N° of holdings | 83 | 78 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 17, 2024 | December 16, 1998 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FOWF and XLI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FOWF is up 8.26% year-to-date (YTD), while XLI has returned 6.56%. That puts FOWF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FOWF or XLI?
Year-to-date, the FOWF ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$1.43B for XLI.
Which ETF is more volatile: FOWF or XLI?
Over the past year, FOWF had a volatility of 16.02%, while XLI experienced 19.29%.
Which ETF is bigger: FOWF or XLI?
As of March 12, 2026, FOWF holds $14.27 M in assets under management (AUM), while XLI manages $28.64 B.
What sectors do the FOWF and XLI ETFs invest in?
FOWF leans toward sectors like Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, XLI focuses on Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FOWF ETF and XLI ETF?
FOWF top holdings include LOCKHEED MARTIN, BOEING U and RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD. XLI holds in its top three: GENERAL ELECTRIC, CATERPILLAR and RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD.
Which ETF is more diversified: FOWF or XLI?
FOWF holds 86 securities with 55.99% of its assets in the top 15. XLI has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.8%.
Investing in Sector ETFs: Energy, Industrials, & Materials
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Sector ETFs (Vanguard versus State Street SPDR)
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.