Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FNDFvsDFIVETF Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. DIMENSIONAL International Value ETF (DFIV) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. FNDF's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, DFIV's top sector exposures are Financials, Materials and Consumer Discretionary. FNDF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.27% for DFIV. FNDF is up 6.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$581M in YTD flows. DFIV performs worse with 6.1% YTD performance, and +$1.30B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDF and DFIV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FNDF vs DFIV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDF DFIV | -5.46%-4.63% | +7.52%+7.81% | +6.30%+6.10% | +37.56%+39.56% | +75.95%+85.63% | +77.61%n/a |
| Flows | FNDF DFIV | +$384M+$483M | +$579M+$1.56B | +$581M+$1.30B | +$2.05B+$4.80B | +$5.07B+$7.66B | +$8.74B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDF DFIV | +16.41%+13.57% | +15.62%+14.67% | +13.59%+13.52% | +14.48%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FNDF DFIV | -9.15%-7.66% | -13.78%-14.39% | -13.78%-14.39% | -25.58%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDF DFIV | 12d10d | 44d44d | 44d44d | 545dn/a |
FNDF | DFIV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.97 | $51.62 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $48.42 | $52.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FNDF | DFIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FNDF | DFIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.97 | $51.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.93% | -1.09% |
| AuM | $21.39 B | $18.05 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.27% |
FNDF | DFIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | Dimensional |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 821 | 473 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | September 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FNDF and DFIV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, FNDF is up 6.3% year-to-date (YTD), while DFIV has returned 6.1%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDF or DFIV?
Year-to-date, the FNDF ETF saw +$581M in flows, compared to +$1.30B for DFIV.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDF or DFIV?
Over the past year, FNDF had a volatility of 15.62%, while DFIV experienced 14.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDF or DFIV?
As of March 13, 2026, FNDF holds $21.39 B in assets under management (AUM), while DFIV manages $18.05 B.
What sectors do the FNDF and DFIV ETFs invest in?
FNDF leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, DFIV focuses on Financials, Materials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FNDF ETF and DFIV ETF?
FNDF top holdings include SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE. DFIV holds in its top three: TOYOTA, BANCO SANTANDER SA and TOTALENERGIES SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDF or DFIV?
FNDF holds 865 securities with 18.13% of its assets in the top 15. DFIV has 519 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.5%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
