Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FNDBvsSPYVETF Comparison
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) belongs to the US All Cap segment. SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. FNDB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.04% for SPYV. FNDB is up 2.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$57M in YTD flows. SPYV performs worse with 0.01% YTD performance, and +$161M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNDB and SPYV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FNDB vs SPYV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNDB SPYV | -3.22%-3.20% | +1.89%-0.24% | +2.54%+0.01% | +22.00%+15.21% | +66.41%+55.91% | +71.91%+65.57% |
| Flows | FNDB SPYV | +$24M+$103M | +$68M+$325M | +$57M+$161M | +$87M+$3.70B | +$321M+$8.62B | +$479M+$14.08B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNDB SPYV | +11.09%+10.14% | +16.78%+15.52% | +13.77%+12.85% | +15.66%+14.45% |
| Max drawdown | FNDB SPYV | -4.63%-4.58% | -12.93%-12.33% | -16.85%-17.49% | -19.24%-17.95% |
| Max drawdown duration | FNDB SPYV | 29d11d | 52d53d | 213d263d | 546d286d |
FNDB | SPYV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 5:03 PM | $27.22 | $56.84 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $27.23 | $56.77 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FNDB | SPYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FNDB | SPYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.22 | $56.84 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | +0.12% |
| AuM | $1.13 B | $31.73 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.04% |
FNDB | SPYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | SPDR |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index | S&P 500 Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 1290 | 426 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 15, 2013 | September 25, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FNDB and SPYV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FNDB is up 2.54% year-to-date (YTD), while SPYV has returned 0.01%. That puts FNDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNDB or SPYV?
Year-to-date, the FNDB ETF saw +$57M in flows, compared to +$161M for SPYV.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNDB or SPYV?
Over the past year, FNDB had a volatility of 16.78%, while SPYV experienced 15.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNDB or SPYV?
As of March 12, 2026, FNDB holds $1.13 B in assets under management (AUM), while SPYV manages $31.73 B.
What sectors do the FNDB and SPYV ETFs invest in?
FNDB leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, SPYV focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the FNDB ETF and SPYV ETF?
FNDB top holdings include APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and EXXON. SPYV holds in its top three: APPLE, AMAZON.COM INC and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: FNDB or SPYV?
FNDB holds 1372 securities with 25.76% of its assets in the top 15. SPYV has 443 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.86%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
