FMFvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund ETF (FMF) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. FMF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. FMF is up 12.19% year-to-date (YTD) with +$63M in YTD flows. CSHI performs worse with 3.86% YTD performance, and +$1.25B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FMF and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FMF vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FMF CSHI | +0.07%+0.31% | +4.12%+1.07% | +12.19%+3.86% | +10.16%+4.85% | +18.70%+16.76% | +27.15%n/a |
| Flows | FMF CSHI | +$8M+$193M | +$36M+$575M | +$63M+$1.25B | +$89M+$1.38B | +$110M+$1.86B | +$218M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FMF CSHI | +6.65%+0.23% | +7.72%+0.52% | +7.39%+1.10% | +8.04%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FMF CSHI | -1.59%n/a | -4.50%-0.18% | -8.51%-1.52% | -14.04%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FMF CSHI | 4dn/a | 119d6d | 541d20d | 1306dn/a |
Trading data
FMF | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $52.11 | $49.61 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $51.77 | $49.59 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FMF | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.11 | $49.61 |
| 1D performance | +0.66% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $293.44 M | $2.06 B |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
FMF | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 1, 2013 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FMF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FMF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
FMF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FMF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FMF and CSHI
How have the FMF and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, FMF is up 12.19% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 3.86%. That puts FMF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FMF or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the FMF ETF saw +$63M in flows, compared to +$1.25B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: FMF or CSHI?
Over the past year, FMF had a volatility of 7.72%, while CSHI experienced 0.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: FMF or CSHI?
As of October 16, 2026, FMF holds $293.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.06 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about FMF & CSHI
Advertisement
Advertisement
