FMAGvsSCHGETF Comparison
VS
Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. FMAG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, SCHG's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. FMAG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.04% for SCHG. FMAG is up 3.1% year-to-date (YTD) with -$32M in YTD flows. SCHG performs better with 8.81% YTD performance, and +$8.10B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FMAG and SCHG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FMAG vs SCHG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FMAG SCHG | -5.05%-0.16% | -2.75%+5.93% | +3.10%+8.81% | +0.91%+12.67% | +60.65%+90.14% | +50.15%+87.44% |
| Flows | FMAG SCHG | +$838K+$3.64B | -$9M+$4.05B | -$32M+$8.10B | -$38M+$9.37B | +$136M+$23.16B | +$146M+$25.91B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FMAG SCHG | +17.87%+14.67% | +16.73%+16.73% | +18.03%+19.75% | +20.21%+22.71% |
| Max drawdown | FMAG SCHG | -7.34%-4.74% | -13.95%-16.35% | -20.04%-23.41% | -32.85%-34.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | FMAG SCHG | 43d19d | 174d188d | 131d193d | 796d754d |
Trading data
FMAG | SCHG | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.55 | $35.43 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $35.21 | $35.40 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FMAG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFMAG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FMAG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.55 | $35.43 |
| 1D performance | +0.97% | +0.08% |
| AuM | $238.74 M | $65.80 B |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.04% |
Characteristics
FMAG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 504 | 188 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 4, 2021 | December 11, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FMAG
USA
92.82%
Other
7.18%
SCHG
USA
98.1%
Other
1.9%
Sectors
FMAG
Technology
55.45%
Industrials
11.52%
Finance
8.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.72%
Other
17.14%
SCHG
Technology
56.71%
Healthcare
9.79%
Finance
7.94%
Industrials
7.15%
Other
18.4%
Advertisement
Diversification
FMAG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.97%
SCHG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
62.14%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FMAG
NVIDIA Corp.
13.03%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.62%
Broadcom Inc.
6.00%
Microsoft Corp.
6.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.76%
KLA Corp.
3.04%
Visa, Inc.
3.03%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.54%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.54%
Amphenol Corp.
2.01%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.96%
TransDigm Group, Inc.
1.91%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
1.89%
Linde Plc
1.87%
Trane Technologies Plc
1.77%
SCHG
Apple, Inc.
10.71%
NVIDIA Corp.
10.30%
Microsoft Corp.
6.26%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.89%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.14%
Broadcom Inc.
3.92%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.34%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.28%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.82%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.68%
Visa, Inc.
2.49%
Tesla, Inc.
2.15%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.85%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.74%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.58%
Frequently asked questions about FMAG and SCHG
How have the FMAG and SCHG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, FMAG is up 3.1% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHG has returned 8.81%. That puts SCHG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FMAG or SCHG?
Year-to-date, the FMAG ETF saw -$32M in flows, compared to +$8.10B for SCHG.
Which ETF is more volatile: FMAG or SCHG?
Over the past year, FMAG had a volatility of 16.73%, while SCHG experienced 16.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: FMAG or SCHG?
As of September 17, 2026, FMAG holds $238.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHG manages $65.80 B.
What sectors do the FMAG and SCHG ETFs invest in?
FMAG leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, SCHG focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the FMAG ETF and SCHG ETF?
FMAG top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Amazon.com, Inc. and Broadcom Inc.. SCHG holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FMAG or SCHG?
FMAG holds 508 securities with 57.97% of its assets in the top 15. SCHG has 189 securities and a top 15 weight of 62.14%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FMAG & SCHG
ETF Comparison: Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Versus Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV)
March 18, 2025
SCHG
3 Famous Mutual Funds That Deserve an ETF Version
June 19, 2024
FMAG
Advertisement
Advertisement
