FLQLvsSCHBETF Comparison
VS
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FLQL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.03% for SCHB. FLQL is up 12.23% year-to-date (YTD) with +$261M in YTD flows. SCHB performs better with 13.29% YTD performance, and +$1.89B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLQL and SCHB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLQL vs SCHB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLQL SCHB | -3.20%-1.08% | -2.56%-0.84% | +12.23%+13.29% | +13.83%+14.77% | +81.66%+81.74% | +82.45%+67.69% |
| Flows | FLQL SCHB | +$12M+$216M | +$102M+$662M | +$261M+$1.89B | +$303M+$1.87B | +$288M+$4.26B | +$379M+$5.68B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLQL SCHB | +11.25%+10.49% | +14.40%+13.16% | +15.72%+15.41% | +16.62%+17.58% |
| Max drawdown | FLQL SCHB | -5.44%-3.57% | -8.99%-8.92% | -19.27%-19.42% | -21.66%-25.37% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLQL SCHB | 29d83d | 47d76d | 124d127d | 688d711d |
Trading data
FLQL | SCHB | |
Last sale 11/4/2026 at 8:59 PM | $77.25 | $29.35 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $76.12 | $29.48 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLQL | SCHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/4/2026 at 8:59 PM
Live
Closed
FLQL | SCHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $77.25 | $29.35 |
| 1D performance | +1.48% | -0.44% |
| AuM | $2.15 B | $44.89 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
FLQL | SCHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Index | Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 215 | 1583 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 26, 2017 | November 3, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLQL
USA
99.63%
Other
0.37%
SCHB
USA
97.61%
Other
2.39%
Sectors
FLQL
Technology
49.12%
Finance
12.93%
Healthcare
9.17%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.71%
Industrials
7.14%
Other
12.93%
SCHB
Technology
46.32%
Finance
13.46%
Healthcare
9.19%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.4%
Industrials
7.06%
Other
15.56%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLQL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.85%
SCHB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.78%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FLQL
Apple, Inc.
7.92%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.20%
Microsoft Corp.
5.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.31%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.22%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.67%
Broadcom Inc.
2.13%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.13%
Johnson & Johnson
1.80%
Visa, Inc.
1.76%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.57%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.48%
Lam Research Corp.
1.48%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.45%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.45%
SCHB
NVIDIA Corp.
7.91%
Apple, Inc.
7.14%
Microsoft Corp.
5.38%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.92%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.46%
Broadcom Inc.
2.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.34%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.75%
Tesla, Inc.
1.53%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.48%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.34%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.30%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.29%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.97%
Frequently asked questions about FLQL and SCHB
How have the FLQL and SCHB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 4, 2026, FLQL is up 12.23% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHB has returned 13.29%. That puts SCHB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLQL or SCHB?
Year-to-date, the FLQL ETF saw +$261M in flows, compared to +$1.89B for SCHB.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLQL or SCHB?
Over the past year, FLQL had a volatility of 14.4%, while SCHB experienced 13.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLQL or SCHB?
As of November 4, 2026, FLQL holds $2.15 B in assets under management (AUM), while SCHB manages $44.89 B.
What sectors do the FLQL and SCHB ETFs invest in?
FLQL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, SCHB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FLQL ETF and SCHB ETF?
FLQL top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. SCHB holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLQL or SCHB?
FLQL holds 216 securities with 44.85% of its assets in the top 15. SCHB has 1585 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.78%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLQL & SCHB
Charles Schwab Asset Management Celebrates 15-Year ETF Anniversary: 3 ETFs to Watch
October 24, 2024
SCHB
ETF Tax Loss Harvesting: How to Use the ETF Central Comparison Tool
October 18, 2024
SCHB
Advertisement
Advertisement
