FLMIvsJCALETF Comparison
Franklin Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (FLMI) and JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond ETF (JCAL) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. FLMI's top 3 sector exposures are Municipal, Consumer Services and Healthcare. In contrast, JCAL's top sector exposures are Municipal and Sovereign. FLMI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.44% for JCAL. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLMI and JCAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FLMI vs JCAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLMI JCAL | +1.21%+1.44% | -2.59%-0.89% | -3.16%n/a | -3.27%n/a | +15.37%n/a | +0.32%n/a |
| Flows | FLMI JCAL | +$30M+$19M | +$164M+$19M | +$1.13B- | +$1.42B- | +$2.32B- | +$2.40B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLMI JCAL | +6.05%+4.62% | +3.83%n/a | +3.94%n/a | +3.85%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FLMI JCAL | -6.74%-5.04% | -8.90%n/a | -8.90%n/a | -16.26%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FLMI JCAL | 71d71d | 236dn/a | 236dn/a | 1340dn/a |
FLMI | JCAL | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.93 | $48.35 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $23.89 | $48.35 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FLMI | JCAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.93 | $48.35 |
| 1D performance | +0.17% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $2.38 B | $512.35 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.44% |
FLMI | JCAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 214 | 106 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2017 | June 12, 2026 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
