FLJHvsNBJPETF Comparison
VS
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. FLJH's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, NBJP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Technology. FLJH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 1.92% for NBJP. FLJH is up 21.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$92M in YTD flows. NBJP performs worse with 14.81% YTD performance, and +$58M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLJH and NBJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLJH vs NBJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLJH NBJP | -3.95%-4.51% | -0.38%-5.52% | +21.22%+14.81% | +33.77%+19.47% | +98.01%n/a | +152.80%n/a |
| Flows | FLJH NBJP | +$27M- | +$59M-$10M | +$92M+$58M | +$100M+$75M | -$61M- | +$165M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLJH NBJP | +20.14%+22.68% | +20.89%+23.29% | +21.61%n/a | +19.46%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FLJH NBJP | -5.44%-11.88% | -11.13%-14.65% | -25.01%n/a | -25.01%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FLJH NBJP | 50d85d | 71d71d | 321dn/a | 321dn/a |
Trading data
FLJH | NBJP | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.33 | $35.54 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $45.53 | $35.87 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NBJP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLJH | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLJH | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.33 | $35.54 |
| 1D performance | -0.45% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $225.55 M | $123.57 M |
| E/R | 0.09% | 1.92% |
Characteristics
FLJH | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Neuberger Berman |
| Benchmark | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 474 | 58 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 2, 2017 | September 12, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLJH
Japan
100%
Other
0%
NBJP
Japan
96.51%
Other
3.49%
Sectors
FLJH
Technology
21.92%
Finance
21.48%
Industrials
18.77%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.97%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.18%
Other
19.67%
NBJP
Industrials
25.89%
Finance
24.24%
Technology
14.76%
Consumer Cyclical.
14.06%
Other
21.06%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.31%
NBJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.77%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FLJH
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.10%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.16%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.74%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.60%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.21%
Sony Group Corp.
2.10%
Advantest Corp.
2.05%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.01%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.99%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.82%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.68%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.54%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.52%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.40%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.39%
NBJP
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
5.02%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
4.88%
Sysmex Corp.
4.28%
Resona Holdings, Inc.
3.93%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.76%
Niterra Co., Ltd.
3.42%
AMADA Co., Ltd.
2.87%
Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd.
2.59%
Kinden Corp.
2.56%
FANUC Corp.
2.52%
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
2.35%
USS Co., Ltd.
2.28%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.17%
Daiei Kankyo Co. Ltd.
2.09%
Toyota Tsusho Corp.
2.05%
Frequently asked questions about FLJH and NBJP
How have the FLJH and NBJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, FLJH is up 21.22% year-to-date (YTD), while NBJP has returned 14.81%. That puts FLJH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLJH or NBJP?
Year-to-date, the FLJH ETF saw +$92M in flows, compared to +$58M for NBJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLJH or NBJP?
Over the past year, FLJH had a volatility of 20.89%, while NBJP experienced 23.29%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLJH or NBJP?
As of September 15, 2026, FLJH holds $225.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while NBJP manages $123.57 M.
What sectors do the FLJH and NBJP ETFs invest in?
FLJH leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, NBJP focuses on Industrials, Finance and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FLJH ETF and NBJP ETF?
FLJH top holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp. and Tokyo Electron Ltd.. NBJP holds in its top three: Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. and Sysmex Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLJH or NBJP?
FLJH holds 474 securities with 32.31% of its assets in the top 15. NBJP has 58 securities and a top 15 weight of 46.77%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLJH & NBJP
Advertisement
