FLCGvsIWFETF Comparison
VS
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. FLCG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.54%, versus 0.18% for IWF. FLCG is up 4.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$246M in YTD flows. IWF performs worse with 2.11% YTD performance, and -$5.78B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLCG and IWF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLCG vs IWF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLCG IWF | -2.83%-3.57% | +3.09%-3.01% | +4.97%+2.11% | +6.70%+4.22% | n/a+76.99% | n/a+71.74% |
| Flows | FLCG IWF | +$30M-$609M | +$42M-$1.69B | +$246M-$5.78B | +$333M-$3.33B | --$2.59B | --$3.71B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLCG IWF | +17.10%+19.43% | +17.05%+17.87% | n/a+19.77% | n/a+21.91% |
| Max drawdown | FLCG IWF | -6.02%-8.30% | -14.95%-16.23% | n/a-23.36% | n/a-32.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLCG IWF | 22d52d | 184d189d | n/a191d | n/a743d |
Trading data
FLCG | IWF | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.58 | $120.54 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $34.53 | $120.45 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLCG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLCG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLCG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.58 | $120.54 |
| 1D performance | +0.14% | +0.07% |
| AuM | $621.30 M | $122.88 B |
| E/R | 0.54% | 0.18% |
Characteristics
FLCG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Federated Investment Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 365 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2024 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLCG
USA
95.51%
Other
4.49%
IWF
USA
98.86%
Other
1.14%
Sectors
FLCG
Technology
68.03%
Industrials
9.11%
Other
22.86%
IWF
Technology
68.67%
Industrials
7.62%
Other
23.71%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
66.41%
IWF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
64.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FLCG
NVIDIA Corp.
13.63%
Alphabet, Inc.
12.34%
Apple, Inc.
8.39%
Microsoft Corp.
5.21%
Broadcom Inc.
3.54%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.08%
Tesla, Inc.
2.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.64%
Viking Holdings Ltd. (Bermuda)
2.38%
Fiserv, Inc.
2.20%
GE Aerospace
2.13%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.08%
Western Digital Corp.
2.06%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.91%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
1.90%
IWF
NVIDIA Corp.
14.27%
Apple, Inc.
8.19%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.66%
Microsoft Corp.
5.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.98%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.09%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.04%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.89%
Tesla, Inc.
2.83%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.48%
Visa, Inc.
1.90%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.46%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.25%
Lam Research Corp.
1.17%
Frequently asked questions about FLCG and IWF
How have the FLCG and IWF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, FLCG is up 4.97% year-to-date (YTD), while IWF has returned 2.11%. That puts FLCG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLCG or IWF?
Year-to-date, the FLCG ETF saw +$246M in flows, compared to -$5.78B for IWF.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLCG or IWF?
Over the past year, FLCG had a volatility of 17.05%, while IWF experienced 17.87%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLCG or IWF?
As of September 14, 2026, FLCG holds $621.30 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWF manages $122.88 B.
What sectors do the FLCG and IWF ETFs invest in?
FLCG leans toward sectors like Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWF focuses on Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FLCG ETF and IWF ETF?
FLCG top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc. and Apple, Inc.. IWF holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLCG or IWF?
FLCG holds 100 securities with 66.41% of its assets in the top 15. IWF has 368 securities and a top 15 weight of 64.56%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLCG & IWF
Advertisement
