FFLSvsLQDHETF Comparison
VS
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. FFLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.05%, versus 0.44% for LQDH. FFLS is up 0.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. LQDH performs better with 3.44% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FFLS and LQDH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FFLS vs LQDH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FFLS LQDH | +2.42%+0.06% | +1.09%+1.26% | +0.39%+3.44% | +1.48%+5.09% | +31.66%+23.19% | n/a+29.42% |
| Flows | FFLS LQDH | +$468K+$28M | +$2M+$97M | +$7M+$27M | +$8M+$88M | +$43M+$346M | -+$6M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FFLS LQDH | +12.50%+1.91% | +10.67%+2.55% | +11.09%+3.30% | n/a+4.31% |
| Max drawdown | FFLS LQDH | -5.80%-0.60% | -9.76%-2.26% | -11.13%-4.48% | n/a-6.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | FFLS LQDH | 65d24d | 210d82d | 394d104d | n/a437d |
Trading data
FFLS | LQDH | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.14 | $92.36 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $23.30 | $92.55 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FFLS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFFLS | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FFLS | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.14 | $92.36 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | -0.21% |
| AuM | $45.65 M | $600.46 M |
| E/R | 2.05% | 0.44% |
Characteristics
FFLS | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Future Fund ETF | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 21, 2023 | May 27, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FFLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FFLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
FFLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FFLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FFLS and LQDH
How have the FFLS and LQDH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, FFLS is up 0.39% year-to-date (YTD), while LQDH has returned 3.44%. That puts LQDH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FFLS or LQDH?
Year-to-date, the FFLS ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$27M for LQDH.
Which ETF is more volatile: FFLS or LQDH?
Over the past year, FFLS had a volatility of 10.67%, while LQDH experienced 2.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: FFLS or LQDH?
As of October 15, 2026, FFLS holds $45.65 M in assets under management (AUM), while LQDH manages $600.46 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about FFLS & LQDH
Advertisement
