FFLSvsCLSEETF Comparison
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. FFLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.05%, versus 1.52% for CLSE. FFLS is up 0.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 23.39% YTD performance, and +$659M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FFLS and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FFLS vs CLSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FFLS CLSE | +2.42%-1.22% | +1.09%+0.02% | +0.39%+23.39% | +1.48%+32.16% | +31.66%+108.86% | n/an/a |
| Flows | FFLS CLSE | +$468K+$87M | +$2M+$266M | +$7M+$659M | +$8M+$692M | +$43M+$847M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FFLS CLSE | +12.50%+8.79% | +10.67%+13.01% | +11.09%+13.47% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FFLS CLSE | -5.80%-3.12% | -9.76%-4.60% | -11.13%-15.76% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FFLS CLSE | 65d43d | 210d40d | 394d188d | n/an/a |
FFLS | CLSE | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.14 | $33.74 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $23.30 | $34.05 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FFLS | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.14 | $33.74 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | -0.91% |
| AuM | $45.65 M | $1.02 B |
| E/R | 2.05% | 1.52% |
FFLS | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Future Fund ETF | Convergence Investment Partners LLC |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 21, 2023 | February 22, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
