Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FFLGvsSCHGETF Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) belongs to the Global Large Cap segment. Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. FFLG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.04% for SCHG. FFLG is down -5.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$17M in YTD flows. SCHG performs worse with -8.3% YTD performance, and +$836M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FFLG and SCHG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FFLG vs SCHG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FFLG SCHG | -2.25%-1.74% | -3.67%-7.48% | -5.38%-8.30% | +27.47%+20.60% | +110.47%+103.65% | +45.49%+87.63% |
| Flows | FFLG SCHG | +$6M+$178M | -$19M+$1.21B | -$17M+$836M | +$42M+$7.42B | +$153M+$16.61B | +$286M+$19.79B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FFLG SCHG | +18.11%+15.51% | +25.00%+23.03% | +21.60%+19.57% | +25.35%+22.47% |
| Max drawdown | FFLG SCHG | -7.28%-9.66% | -17.98%-15.72% | -26.71%-23.41% | -45.40%-34.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | FFLG SCHG | 45d78d | 45d45d | 155d193d | 927d754d |
FFLG | SCHG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.30 | $29.91 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $28.53 | $30.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FFLG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FFLG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.30 | $29.91 |
| 1D performance | -0.81% | -1.09% |
| AuM | $477.61 M | $49.29 B |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.04% |
FFLG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 78 | 169 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 4, 2021 | December 11, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FFLG and SCHG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, FFLG is down -5.38% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHG has lost -8.3%. That puts FFLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FFLG or SCHG?
Year-to-date, the FFLG ETF saw -$17M in flows, compared to +$836M for SCHG.
Which ETF is more volatile: FFLG or SCHG?
Over the past year, FFLG had a volatility of 25%, while SCHG experienced 23.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: FFLG or SCHG?
As of March 13, 2026, FFLG holds $477.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHG manages $49.29 B.
What sectors do the FFLG and SCHG ETFs invest in?
FFLG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SCHG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FFLG ETF and SCHG ETF?
FFLG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. SCHG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FFLG or SCHG?
FFLG holds 94 securities with 66.77% of its assets in the top 15. SCHG has 189 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.64%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
