FEPIvsGPIXETF Comparison
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. FEPI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.35% for GPIX. FEPI is up 6.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$187M in YTD flows. GPIX performs better with 13.39% YTD performance, and +$3.49B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FEPI and GPIX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FEPI vs GPIX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEPI GPIX | -5.03%+0.30% | +6.08%+3.89% | +6.81%+13.39% | +8.12%+14.07% | +68.33%+82.06% | n/an/a |
| Flows | FEPI GPIX | +$39M+$457M | +$56M+$1.40B | +$187M+$3.49B | +$263M+$4.16B | +$870M+$6.00B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FEPI GPIX | +19.41%+9.08% | +20.36%+11.05% | +19.78%+13.22% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FEPI GPIX | -7.00%-2.15% | -15.13%-7.71% | -23.63%-17.62% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FEPI GPIX | 16d36d | 110d47d | 201d126d | n/an/a |
FEPI | GPIX | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.12 | $56.06 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $40.55 | $55.77 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FEPI | GPIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.12 | $56.06 |
| 1D performance | +1.41% | +0.52% |
| AuM | $707.08 M | $6.37 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.35% |
FEPI | GPIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | REX Shares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 11, 2023 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
