FEBZvsJEPQETF Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF - USD
TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF - USD (FEBZ) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. FEBZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.35% for JEPQ. FEBZ is up 8.99% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. JEPQ performs better with 11.86% YTD performance, and +$10.43B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FEBZ and JEPQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FEBZ vs JEPQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEBZ JEPQ | -0.66%-1.70% | +2.33%+4.80% | +8.99%+11.86% | +10.15%+15.08% | +57.58%+77.85% | +62.25%n/a |
| Flows | FEBZ JEPQ | -+$1.49B | +$2M+$3.80B | +$16M+$10.43B | +$18M+$11.80B | +$26M+$33.73B | +$26M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FEBZ JEPQ | +8.47%+13.90% | +9.80%+14.95% | +11.23%+15.77% | +12.49%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FEBZ JEPQ | -2.68%-5.97% | -7.06%-8.85% | -14.36%-20.17% | -17.66%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FEBZ JEPQ | 68d13d | 92d76d | 126d169d | 530dn/a |
FEBZ | JEPQ | |
Last sale 10/21/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.22 | $59.95 |
| Previous close 10/20/2026 | $41.01 | $59.44 |
| Consolidated volume 10/20/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FEBZ | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.22 | $59.95 |
| 1D performance | +0.52% | +0.86% |
| AuM | $32.42 M | $43.88 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.35% |
FEBZ | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | TrueShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2021 | May 3, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
