FCTRvsOAKMETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. FCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, OAKM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. FCTR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.64% for OAKM. FCTR is up 10.86% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. OAKM performs worse with 8.67% YTD performance, and +$111M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCTR and OAKM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FCTR vs OAKM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCTR OAKM | -1.50%-0.13% | -1.59%+10.18% | +10.86%+8.67% | +14.35%+17.84% | +55.79%n/a | +13.41%n/a |
| Flows | FCTR OAKM | --$6M | --$25M | -$4M+$111M | -$11M+$363M | -$100M- | -$290M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCTR OAKM | +21.19%+13.37% | +19.50%+13.52% | +18.93%n/a | +20.42%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FCTR OAKM | -10.03%-4.09% | -11.18%-7.12% | -22.60%n/a | -37.23%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FCTR OAKM | 86d7d | 37d174d | 231dn/a | 1186dn/a |
Trading data
FCTR | OAKM | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.59 | $31.07 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $39.25 | $30.81 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OAKM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFCTR | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FCTR | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.59 | $31.07 |
| 1D performance | +0.86% | +0.83% |
| AuM | $55.14 M | $1.14 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.64% |
Characteristics
FCTR | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Oakmark Funds |
| Benchmark | Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 165 | 39 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 25, 2018 | December 2, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FCTR
USA
95.63%
Other
4.37%
OAKM
USA
91.9%
Other
8.1%
Sectors
FCTR
Finance
35.6%
Technology
13.21%
Healthcare
12.74%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10%
Industrials
7.43%
Other
21.02%
OAKM
Finance
40.01%
Healthcare
13.19%
Technology
11.69%
Other
35.11%
Advertisement
Diversification
FCTR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.33%
OAKM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.35%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FCTR
Humana, Inc.
2.15%
Centene Corp.
2.04%
The Allstate Corp.
1.60%
Visa, Inc.
1.54%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.44%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
1.40%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
1.37%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
1.35%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.32%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
1.29%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.26%
Johnson & Johnson
1.17%
Adobe, Inc.
1.14%
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
1.14%
Intuit, Inc.
1.12%
OAKM
Willis Towers Watson Plc
3.71%
Citigroup, Inc.
3.63%
Targa Resources Corp.
3.53%
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
3.53%
Airbnb, Inc.
3.46%
Bank of America Corp.
3.45%
Capital One Financial Corp.
3.44%
State Street Corp.
3.39%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
3.37%
Salesforce, Inc.
3.30%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.24%
Merck & Co., Inc.
3.15%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
3.10%
Corteva, Inc.
3.04%
Elevance Health, Inc.
3.01%
Frequently asked questions about FCTR and OAKM
How have the FCTR and OAKM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 9, 2026, FCTR is up 10.86% year-to-date (YTD), while OAKM has returned 8.67%. That puts FCTR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCTR or OAKM?
Year-to-date, the FCTR ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to +$111M for OAKM.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCTR or OAKM?
Over the past year, FCTR had a volatility of 19.5%, while OAKM experienced 13.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCTR or OAKM?
As of September 9, 2026, FCTR holds $55.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while OAKM manages $1.14 B.
What sectors do the FCTR and OAKM ETFs invest in?
FCTR leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, OAKM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FCTR ETF and OAKM ETF?
FCTR top holdings include Humana, Inc., Centene Corp. and The Allstate Corp.. OAKM holds in its top three: Willis Towers Watson Plc, Citigroup, Inc. and Targa Resources Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FCTR or OAKM?
FCTR holds 165 securities with 21.33% of its assets in the top 15. OAKM has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.35%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FCTR & OAKM
Advertisement
Advertisement
