Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FCLDvsHACKETF Comparison
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) belongs to the Cloud Computing segment. Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is part of the Cybersecurity segment. FCLD's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Real Estate and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, HACK's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials FCLD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.6% for HACK. FCLD is down -6.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. HACK performs better with -2.96% YTD performance, and -$69M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCLD and HACK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FCLD vs HACK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCLD HACK | -1.53%+0.49% | -8.90%-9.16% | -6.15%-2.96% | +15.10%+7.97% | +77.68%+75.77% | n/a+40.14% |
| Flows | FCLD HACK | --$23M | -$4M-$88M | -$4M-$69M | -$12M-$143M | +$29M-$275M | --$599M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCLD HACK | +27.82%+24.60% | +29.42%+25.31% | +24.89%+21.19% | n/a+22.93% |
| Max drawdown | FCLD HACK | -12.88%-17.44% | -19.36%-20.50% | -31.77%-21.58% | n/a-38.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | FCLD HACK | 41d90d | 43d153d | 318d106d | n/a1016d |
FCLD | HACK | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.12 | $78.44 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $28.02 | $77.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FCLD | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FCLD | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.12 | $78.44 |
| 1D performance | +0.36% | +0.69% |
| AuM | $79.57 M | $1.97 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.6% |
FCLD | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Cloud Computing Index | ISE Cyber Security Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 23 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 5, 2021 | November 12, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FCLD and HACK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FCLD is down -6.15% year-to-date (YTD), while HACK has lost -2.96%. That puts HACK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCLD or HACK?
Year-to-date, the FCLD ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to -$69M for HACK.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCLD or HACK?
Over the past year, FCLD had a volatility of 29.42%, while HACK experienced 25.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCLD or HACK?
As of March 10, 2026, FCLD holds $79.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while HACK manages $1.97 B.
What sectors do the FCLD and HACK ETFs invest in?
FCLD leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Real Estate. Meanwhile, HACK focuses on Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FCLD ETF and HACK ETF?
FCLD top holdings include US80004C2008, WESTERN DIGITAL and SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC. HACK holds in its top three: BROADCOM LIMITED, CISCO-T and NORTHROP GRUMMAN.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCLD or HACK?
FCLD holds 50 securities with 54.55% of its assets in the top 15. HACK has 23 securities and a top 15 weight of 74.57%.
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
