FCAvsCQQQETF Comparison
VS
First Trust China AlphaDEX ETF (FCA) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. FCA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Energy. In contrast, CQQQ's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. FCA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.65% for CQQQ. FCA is down -11.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$25M in YTD flows. CQQQ performs worse with -23.25% YTD performance, and -$222M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCA and CQQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FCA vs CQQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCA CQQQ | -7.40%-11.78% | -8.79%-19.95% | -11.69%-23.25% | -12.22%-29.53% | +47.62%+16.97% | +5.94%-40.46% |
| Flows | FCA CQQQ | --$404M | -$1M-$602M | -$25M-$222M | -$25M-$279M | +$13M+$1.68B | +$16M+$1.63B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCA CQQQ | +15.98%+22.52% | +21.26%+28.29% | +22.65%+29.77% | +22.83%+32.71% |
| Max drawdown | FCA CQQQ | -14.17%-25.59% | -28.57%-32.52% | -28.57%-33.09% | -35.48%-61.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | FCA CQQQ | 79d80d | 168d289d | 168d387d | 1306d1802d |
Trading data
FCA | CQQQ | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.72 | $38.74 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $23.72 | $39.79 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FCA | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FCA | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.72 | $38.74 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -2.64% |
| AuM | $27.43 M | $1.87 B |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
FCA | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index | FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 174 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 18, 2011 | December 8, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
FCA
China
83.78%
Other
16.22%
CQQQ
China
86.65%
Ireland
10.9%
Other
2.45%
Sectors
FCA
Finance
21.06%
Technology
14.17%
Energy
12.36%
Industrials
11.43%
Healthcare
10.43%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.69%
Other
22.86%
CQQQ
Technology
65.99%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.9%
Consumer Services
10.74%
Other
12.37%
Advertisement
Diversification
FCA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.24%
CQQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.76%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FCA
Lenovo Group Ltd.
4.25%
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co. Ltd.
4.25%
ENN Energy Holdings Ltd.
3.89%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
3.85%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
3.62%
Sinotruk Hong Kong Ltd.
3.28%
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
3.12%
3SBio, Inc.
3.04%
Weichai Power Co., Ltd.
2.97%
China Hongqiao Group Ltd.
2.96%
China Reinsurance (Group) Corp.
2.94%
AAC Technologies Holdings, Inc.
2.64%
Anhui Conch Cement Co., Ltd.
2.57%
BYD Electronic (International) Co., Ltd.
2.46%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
2.40%
CQQQ
PDD Holdings, Inc.
10.90%
Meituan
10.38%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.11%
Baidu, Inc.
7.54%
Kuaishou Technology
3.86%
Hua Hong Grace Semiconductor Ltd.
3.26%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
1.99%
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.
1.89%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.73%
SenseTime Group, Inc.
1.67%
Horizon Robotics
1.61%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.58%
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd.
1.56%
Bilibili, Inc.
1.41%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
1.28%
Frequently asked questions about FCA and CQQQ
How have the FCA and CQQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, FCA is down -11.69% year-to-date (YTD), while CQQQ has lost -23.25%. That puts FCA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCA or CQQQ?
Year-to-date, the FCA ETF saw -$25M in flows, compared to -$222M for CQQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCA or CQQQ?
Over the past year, FCA had a volatility of 21.26%, while CQQQ experienced 28.29%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCA or CQQQ?
As of October 28, 2026, FCA holds $27.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while CQQQ manages $1.87 B.
What sectors do the FCA and CQQQ ETFs invest in?
FCA leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Energy. Meanwhile, CQQQ focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services.
What are the top holdings of the FCA ETF and CQQQ ETF?
FCA top holdings include Lenovo Group Ltd., COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co. Ltd. and ENN Energy Holdings Ltd.. CQQQ holds in its top three: PDD Holdings, Inc., Meituan and Tencent Holdings Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: FCA or CQQQ?
FCA holds 43 securities with 48.24% of its assets in the top 15. CQQQ has 180 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.76%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FCA & CQQQ
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CQQQ
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CQQQ
Advertisement
Advertisement
