FAARvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-1.21%
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. FAAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.97%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. FAAR is up 21.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$102M in YTD flows. QDPL performs worse with 10.85% YTD performance, and +$311M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FAAR and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FAAR vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FAAR QDPL | +2.23%-0.94% | +4.85%+1.75% | +21.90%+10.85% | +20.16%+11.57% | +34.93%+79.62% | +38.39%+68.91% |
| Flows | FAAR QDPL | +$18M+$26M | +$51M+$114M | +$102M+$311M | +$126M+$404M | +$63M+$1.38B | +$129M+$1.53B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FAAR QDPL | +9.86%+9.99% | +12.16%+11.76% | +10.87%+13.51% | +10.94%+15.37% |
| Max drawdown | FAAR QDPL | -2.30%-2.92% | -10.76%-8.32% | -11.20%-17.47% | -19.53%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | FAAR QDPL | 11d24d | 164d70d | 111d126d | 1323d704d |
Trading data
FAAR | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.54 | $45.22 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $32.61 | $46.18 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FAAR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFAAR | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FAAR | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.54 | $45.22 |
| 1D performance | -0.23% | -2.08% |
| AuM | $252.85 M | $1.82 B |
| E/R | 0.97% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
FAAR | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 18, 2016 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
FAAR
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FAAR
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
FAAR
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FAAR
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FAAR and QDPL
How have the FAAR and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, FAAR is up 21.9% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 10.85%. That puts FAAR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FAAR or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the FAAR ETF saw +$102M in flows, compared to +$311M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: FAAR or QDPL?
Over the past year, FAAR had a volatility of 12.16%, while QDPL experienced 11.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: FAAR or QDPL?
As of October 29, 2026, FAAR holds $252.85 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.82 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about FAAR & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
