EWSvsBBCAETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EWS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, BBCA's top sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Non-Energy Materials. EWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.19% for BBCA. EWS is up 24.04% year-to-date (YTD) with +$403M in YTD flows. BBCA performs worse with 13.21% YTD performance, and +$389M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EWS and BBCA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EWS vs BBCA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EWS BBCA | -0.93%-1.55% | +17.65%+4.21% | +24.04%+13.21% | +20.53%+23.00% | +109.03%+85.66% | +84.00%+80.76% |
| Flows | EWS BBCA | +$136M-$5M | +$293M+$189M | +$403M+$389M | +$334M+$369M | +$429M+$491M | +$412M+$1.30B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EWS BBCA | +13.09%+11.39% | +12.95%+13.91% | +14.24%+14.61% | +15.58%+16.59% |
| Max drawdown | EWS BBCA | -2.66%-3.73% | -7.18%-8.26% | -14.93%-12.32% | -28.60%-24.42% |
| Max drawdown duration | EWS BBCA | 4d17d | 90d45d | 54d149d | 1033d778d |
Trading data
EWS | BBCA | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.62 | $104.47 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $33.37 | $103.93 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EWS | BBCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EWS | BBCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.62 | $104.47 |
| 1D performance | +0.75% | +0.52% |
| AuM | $1.33 B | $11.11 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
EWS | BBCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI Singapore 25/50 Index | Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index |
| N° of holdings | 17 | 75 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 1996 | August 8, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EWS
Singapore
95.9%
Other
4.1%
BBCA
Canada
97.56%
Other
2.44%
Sectors
EWS
Finance
63.37%
Industrials
12.29%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.85%
Utilities
7.75%
Other
7.73%
BBCA
Finance
46.68%
Energy
17.51%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.99%
Industrials
7.22%
Other
15.6%
Advertisement
Diversification
EWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
98.59%
BBCA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EWS
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
24.07%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
21.89%
Sea Ltd. (Singapore)
4.86%
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
4.63%
Singapore Airlines Ltd.
4.52%
Keppel Ltd.
4.48%
Singapore Exchange Ltd.
4.44%
CapitaLand Ascendas REIT
4.13%
Wilmar International Ltd.
4.00%
Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) Ltd.
3.91%
Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore)
3.88%
Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd.
3.85%
Singapore Telecommunications Ltd.
3.67%
Sembcorp Industries Ltd.
3.28%
CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust
2.99%
BBCA
Royal Bank of Canada
9.66%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
6.60%
Shopify, Inc.
5.10%
Bank of Montreal
4.15%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.97%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.60%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.52%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
3.01%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.
2.67%
Brookfield Corp.
2.54%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.49%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.45%
Manulife Financial Corp.
2.44%
Canadian National Railway Co.
2.34%
TC Energy Corp.
2.33%
Frequently asked questions about EWS and BBCA
How have the EWS and BBCA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, EWS is up 24.04% year-to-date (YTD), while BBCA has returned 13.21%. That puts EWS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EWS or BBCA?
Year-to-date, the EWS ETF saw +$403M in flows, compared to +$389M for BBCA.
Which ETF is more volatile: EWS or BBCA?
Over the past year, EWS had a volatility of 12.95%, while BBCA experienced 13.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: EWS or BBCA?
As of September 11, 2026, EWS holds $1.33 B in assets under management (AUM), while BBCA manages $11.11 B.
What sectors do the EWS and BBCA ETFs invest in?
EWS leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, BBCA focuses on Finance, Energy and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EWS ETF and BBCA ETF?
EWS top holdings include DBS Group Holdings Ltd., Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd. and Sea Ltd. (Singapore). BBCA holds in its top three: Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank and Shopify, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EWS or BBCA?
EWS holds 17 securities with 98.59% of its assets in the top 15. BBCA has 77 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.88%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EWS & BBCA
Advertisement
