Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EWJvsNBJPETF Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. EWJ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, NBJP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. EWJ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 1.92% for NBJP. EWJ is up 6.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3.07B in YTD flows. NBJP performs better with 8.16% YTD performance, and +$63M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EWJ and NBJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EWJ vs NBJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EWJ NBJP | -8.69%-6.05% | +5.62%+8.39% | +6.27%+8.16% | +31.08%+38.98% | +65.21%n/a | +42.06%n/a |
| Flows | EWJ NBJP | +$2.66B+$27M | +$3.37B+$63M | +$3.07B+$63M | +$2.52B+$90M | +$4.16B- | +$2.46B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EWJ NBJP | +21.47%+21.62% | +21.38%+19.95% | +18.50%n/a | +18.07%n/a |
| Max drawdown | EWJ NBJP | -9.86%-8.87% | -14.78%-13.15% | -15.70%n/a | -33.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EWJ NBJP | 28d9d | 37d33d | 225dn/a | 902dn/a |
EWJ | NBJP | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $84.19 | $32.62 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $85.73 | $33.33 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EWJ | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EWJ | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $84.19 | $32.62 |
| 1D performance | -1.80% | -2.15% |
| AuM | $19.47 B | $120.57 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 1.92% |
EWJ | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Neuberger Berman |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 179 | 57 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 1996 | September 12, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EWJ and NBJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EWJ is up 6.27% year-to-date (YTD), while NBJP has returned 8.16%. That puts NBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EWJ or NBJP?
Year-to-date, the EWJ ETF saw +$3.07B in flows, compared to +$63M for NBJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: EWJ or NBJP?
Over the past year, EWJ had a volatility of 21.38%, while NBJP experienced 19.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: EWJ or NBJP?
As of March 11, 2026, EWJ holds $19.47 B in assets under management (AUM), while NBJP manages $120.57 M.
What sectors do the EWJ and NBJP ETFs invest in?
EWJ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, NBJP focuses on Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the EWJ ETF and NBJP ETF?
EWJ top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. NBJP holds in its top three: MIZUHO FINANCIAL, UACJ CORP and SUMITOMO REALTY.
Which ETF is more diversified: EWJ or NBJP?
EWJ holds 182 securities with 37.21% of its assets in the top 15. NBJP has 58 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.06%.
Ask the Manager: Kei Okamura Breaks Down Japan’s Investment Case
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Japanese Equity ETFs
An introduction to Country-Based ETFs
An introduction to Country-Based ETFs
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
