Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ESPOvsBETZETF Comparison
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) belong to the same industry segment: New Consumers & Focus. ESPO's top 3 sector exposures are Communication Services, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology. In contrast, BETZ's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services ESPO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.75% for BETZ. ESPO is down -10.05% year-to-date (YTD) with -$60M in YTD flows. BETZ performs worse with -12.94% YTD performance, and -$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ESPO and BETZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ESPO vs BETZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ESPO BETZ | -3.31%+3.32% | -12.58%-12.52% | -10.05%-12.94% | +8.44%-0.37% | +101.39%+25.78% | +43.83%-39.15% |
| Flows | ESPO BETZ | -$9M- | -$66M-$3M | -$60M-$3M | -$45M-$16M | -$165M-$95M | -$537M-$251M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ESPO BETZ | +19.93%+21.72% | +20.41%+20.39% | +20.30%+19.78% | +23.90%+24.92% |
| Max drawdown | ESPO BETZ | -15.42%-18.89% | -25.14%-29.04% | -25.14%-29.04% | -47.95%-60.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | ESPO BETZ | 90d72d | 161d196d | 161d196d | 1032d1780d |
ESPO | BETZ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $92.38 | $18.19 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $91.81 | $18.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ESPO | BETZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ESPO | BETZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $92.38 | $18.19 |
| 1D performance | +0.62% | -0.68% |
| AuM | $275.47 M | $52.41 M |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.75% |
ESPO | BETZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Roundhill Investments |
| Benchmark | MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index | Morningstar Sports Betting & iGaming Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 26 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 16, 2018 | June 4, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ESPO and BETZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ESPO is down -10.05% year-to-date (YTD), while BETZ has lost -12.94%. That puts ESPO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ESPO or BETZ?
Year-to-date, the ESPO ETF saw -$60M in flows, compared to -$3M for BETZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: ESPO or BETZ?
Over the past year, ESPO had a volatility of 20.41%, while BETZ experienced 20.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: ESPO or BETZ?
As of March 11, 2026, ESPO holds $275.47 M in assets under management (AUM), while BETZ manages $52.41 M.
What sectors do the ESPO and BETZ ETFs invest in?
ESPO leans toward sectors like Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, BETZ focuses on Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ESPO ETF and BETZ ETF?
ESPO top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, NINTENDO and US64110W1027. BETZ holds in its top three: FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT, EVOLUTION AB and DRAFTKINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: ESPO or BETZ?
ESPO holds 25 securities with 80.16% of its assets in the top 15. BETZ has 27 securities and a top 15 weight of 81.01%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
