Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EPSVvsAFMCETF Comparison
Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) and First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. EPSV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.88%, versus 0.65% for AFMC. EPSV is up 6.9% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. AFMC performs worse with 4.33% YTD performance, and +$35M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EPSV and AFMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EPSV vs AFMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EPSV AFMC | -4.77%-4.14% | +6.52%+2.89% | +6.90%+4.33% | n/a+19.41% | n/a+62.57% | n/a+56.78% |
| Flows | EPSV AFMC | -+$20M | -+$35M | -+$35M | -+$80M | -+$120M | -+$119M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EPSV AFMC | +17.88%+14.82% | n/a+19.46% | n/a+17.77% | n/a+19.50% |
| Max drawdown | EPSV AFMC | -6.93%-5.13% | n/a-13.21% | n/a-21.83% | n/a-25.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | EPSV AFMC | 15d16d | n/a46d | n/a289d | n/a752d |
EPSV | AFMC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.44 | $35.92 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $25.44 | $35.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
EPSV | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.44 | $35.92 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $4.47 M | $134.67 M |
| E/R | 0.88% | 0.65% |
EPSV | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Harbor Capital | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 55 | 258 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 1, 2025 | December 3, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EPSV and AFMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, EPSV is up 6.9% year-to-date (YTD), while AFMC has returned 4.33%. That puts EPSV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EPSV or AFMC?
Year-to-date, the EPSV ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$35M for AFMC.
Which ETF is bigger: EPSV or AFMC?
As of March 9, 2026, EPSV holds $4.47 M in assets under management (AUM), while AFMC manages $134.67 M.
What sectors do the EPSV and AFMC ETFs invest in?
EPSV leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, AFMC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the EPSV ETF and AFMC ETF?
EPSV top holdings include FLEX LTD, ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES and MOOG. AFMC holds in its top three: MUELLER INDUSTRIES, FEDERATED HERMES and EXELIXIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: EPSV or AFMC?
EPSV holds 55 securities with 40.26% of its assets in the top 15. AFMC has 265 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.32%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
