EMQQvsKWEBETF Comparison
VS
The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) belong to the same industry segment: EM Awakening. EMQQ's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, KWEB's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Real Estate. EMQQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.86%, versus 0.7% for KWEB. EMQQ is down -21.29% year-to-date (YTD) with -$25M in YTD flows. KWEB performs worse with -25.8% YTD performance, and -$460M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMQQ and KWEB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMQQ vs KWEB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMQQ KWEB | -3.14%-10.34% | -5.08%-13.45% | -21.29%-25.80% | -18.45%-19.51% | +9.39%-0.05% | -45.24%-54.53% |
| Flows | EMQQ KWEB | -$3M-$1.19B | -$13M-$119M | -$25M-$460M | -$25M+$1.27B | -$295M+$2.15B | -$683M+$8.61B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMQQ KWEB | +20.20%+25.45% | +17.58%+23.35% | +20.12%+30.14% | +28.08%+40.80% |
| Max drawdown | EMQQ KWEB | -11.92%-15.94% | -31.26%-37.39% | -31.26%-37.39% | -65.94%-71.82% |
| Max drawdown duration | EMQQ KWEB | 61d64d | 275d260d | 275d260d | 1816d1816d |
Trading data
EMQQ | KWEB | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.63 | $25.24 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $31.68 | $25.38 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMQQ | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMQQ | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.63 | $25.24 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | -0.55% |
| AuM | $255.61 M | $5.42 B |
| E/R | 0.86% | 0.7% |
Characteristics
EMQQ | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Exchange Traded Concepts | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index | CSI Overseas China Internet Index |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 24 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 12, 2014 | July 31, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EMQQ
Cayman Islands
33.49%
USA
27.06%
Other
39.45%
KWEB
Cayman Islands
69.53%
USA
26.66%
Other
3.81%
Sectors
EMQQ
Consumer Discreti.
42.5%
Communication Ser.
18.95%
Other
38.55%
KWEB
Consumer Discreti.
43.68%
Communication Ser.
34.66%
Other
21.66%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.74%
KWEB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
EMQQ
MERCADOLIBRE
8.45%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
6.83%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
6.76%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
6.28%
US81141R1005
5.48%
MEITUAN
4.23%
NASPERS-N-
3.23%
COUPANG
3.20%
BAJAJ FINANCE
3.18%
JD.COM INC
3.16%
NETEASE INC
2.94%
BAIDU
2.63%
TRIP.COM GROUP
2.59%
NAVER CORP
2.51%
ZOMATO LTD
2.27%
KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS
9.62%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
9.33%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
8.58%
MEITUAN
7.28%
NETEASE INC
6.12%
JD.COM INC
4.98%
KE HOLDINGS
4.78%
BAIDU
4.74%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.85%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
3.81%
US35969L1089
3.69%
US8740801043
3.32%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
3.12%
BILIBILI
3.08%
US48553T1060
2.94%
Frequently asked questions about EMQQ and KWEB
How have the EMQQ and KWEB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 19, 2026, EMQQ is down -21.29% year-to-date (YTD), while KWEB has lost -25.8%. That puts EMQQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMQQ or KWEB?
Year-to-date, the EMQQ ETF saw -$25M in flows, compared to -$460M for KWEB.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMQQ or KWEB?
Over the past year, EMQQ had a volatility of 17.58%, while KWEB experienced 23.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMQQ or KWEB?
As of June 19, 2026, EMQQ holds $255.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while KWEB manages $5.42 B.
What sectors do the EMQQ and KWEB ETFs invest in?
EMQQ leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, KWEB focuses on Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the EMQQ ETF and KWEB ETF?
EMQQ top holdings include MERCADOLIBRE, PINDUODUO INC ADR and ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD. KWEB holds in its top three: TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR.
Which ETF is more diversified: EMQQ or KWEB?
EMQQ holds 40 securities with 63.74% of its assets in the top 15. KWEB has 31 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EMQQ & KWEB
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
December 18, 2025
KWEB
Surprising emerging markets where opportunity abounds
July 17, 2025
EMQQ
Ask the Manager: Kevin Carter on Why India is the "Perfect Emerging Market"
February 13, 2025
EMQQ
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
KWEB
Advertisement
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KWEB
Advertisement
