Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EMLPvsIGFETF Comparison
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure ETF
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure ETF (EMLP) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. EMLP's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, IGF's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. EMLP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.95%, versus 0.39% for IGF. EMLP is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$79M in YTD flows. IGF performs worse with 8.74% YTD performance, and +$290M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMLP and IGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EMLP vs IGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMLP IGF | +4.18%-0.90% | +14.61%+9.32% | +14.97%+8.74% | +23.72%+30.82% | +85.00%+59.33% | +125.65%+73.10% |
| Flows | EMLP IGF | +$63M+$177M | +$100M+$443M | +$79M+$290M | +$196M+$2.40B | +$71M+$3.99B | +$380M+$4.62B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMLP IGF | +10.15%+9.83% | +13.57%+11.89% | +13.04%+11.90% | +14.61%+13.21% |
| Max drawdown | EMLP IGF | -1.89%-3.66% | -11.20%-8.54% | -11.35%-14.82% | -14.41%-20.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | EMLP IGF | 8d10d | 106d14d | 177d321d | 329d747d |
EMLP | IGF | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:55 PM | $43.54 | $66.58 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $43.53 | $66.83 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EMLP | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EMLP | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.54 | $66.58 |
| 1D performance | +0.02% | -0.37% |
| AuM | $3.97 B | $10.00 B |
| E/R | 0.95% | 0.39% |
EMLP | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 60 | 68 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2012 | December 10, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EMLP and IGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EMLP is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD), while IGF has returned 8.74%. That puts EMLP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMLP or IGF?
Year-to-date, the EMLP ETF saw +$79M in flows, compared to +$290M for IGF.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMLP or IGF?
Over the past year, EMLP had a volatility of 13.57%, while IGF experienced 11.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMLP or IGF?
As of March 11, 2026, EMLP holds $3.97 B in assets under management (AUM), while IGF manages $10.00 B.
What sectors do the EMLP and IGF ETFs invest in?
EMLP leans toward sectors like Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, IGF focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the EMLP ETF and IGF ETF?
EMLP top holdings include ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS UNT, ENERGY TRANSFER LP UNITS and MPLX COMMON UNITS. IGF holds in its top three: NEXTERA ENERGY, ES0105046017 and TRANSURBAN GRP REIT.
Which ETF is more diversified: EMLP or IGF?
EMLP holds 61 securities with 51.31% of its assets in the top 15. IGF has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.22%.
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
Moving Beyond the 60/40 Convention
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.