EMETvsPHOETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF (EMET) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. EMET's top 3 sector exposures are and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are and Industrials.Healthcare, Non-Energy Materials, EMET is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.62%, versus 0.59% for PHO. EMET is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$752K in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with -2.38% YTD performance, and -$72M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMET and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMET vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMET PHO | -4.38%+0.84% | -12.09%-1.14% | +3.42%-2.38% | +49.15%-2.82% | +45.99%+19.55% | n/a+26.02% |
| Flows | EMET PHO | -$4M-$18M | +$267K-$67M | +$752K-$72M | +$3M-$174M | +$1M-$296M | --$201M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMET PHO | +42.89%+16.50% | +37.00%+15.63% | +31.57%+16.41% | n/a+18.29% |
| Max drawdown | EMET PHO | -22.93%-7.56% | -24.48%-13.83% | -39.33%-19.26% | n/a-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | EMET PHO | 72d60d | 145d276d | 478d250d | n/a715d |
Trading data
EMET | PHO | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $69.22 | |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $68.43 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMET | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMET | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $69.22 |
| 1D performance | – | +1.15% |
| AuM | $32.57 M | $1.96 B |
| E/R | 0.62% | 0.59% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EMET
Canada
18.81%
USA
16.47%
China
15.44%
United Kingdom
13.86%
Australia
7.51%
South Africa
7.27%
Other
20.65%
PHO
USA
94.59%
Other
5.41%
Sectors
EMET
Non-Energy Materi.
99.45%
Other
0.55%
PHO
Industrials
46.17%
Healthcare
17.05%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.79%
Technology
12.53%
Utilities
7.45%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMET
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.15%
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.4%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
EMET
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
8.08%
Anglo American Plc
7.91%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
7.17%
Teck Resources Limited
6.42%
Antofagasta Plc
5.04%
Southern Copper Corp.
3.69%
Boliden AB
3.67%
Lundin Mining Corp.
3.32%
Valterra Platinum Ltd.
2.99%
Albemarle Corp.
2.93%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
2.92%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
2.54%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd.
2.32%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
2.10%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
2.05%
PHO
Ecolab, Inc.
8.49%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
7.96%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
7.10%
Waters Corp.
6.76%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
6.45%
Veralto Corp.
4.18%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.12%
Xylem, Inc.
4.07%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
3.84%
Pentair plc
3.73%
IDEX Corp.
3.66%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.21%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
3.16%
AECOM
2.97%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.72%
Frequently asked questions about EMET and PHO
How have the EMET and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, EMET is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has lost -2.38%. That puts EMET better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMET or PHO?
Year-to-date, the EMET ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to -$72M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMET or PHO?
Over the past year, EMET had a volatility of 37%, while PHO experienced 15.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMET or PHO?
As of July 24, 2026, EMET holds $32.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $1.96 B.
What sectors do the EMET and PHO ETFs invest in?
EMET leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EMET ETF and PHO ETF?
EMET top holdings include Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.. PHO holds in its top three: Ecolab, Inc., Roper Technologies, Inc. and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EMET or PHO?
EMET holds 57 securities with 63.15% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.4%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EMET & PHO
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
