EMETvsMOOETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF (EMET) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. EMET's top 3 sector exposures are and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.Non-Energy Materials, Industrials, EMET is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.62%, versus 0.56% for MOO. EMET is up 3.86% year-to-date (YTD) with +$752K in YTD flows. MOO performs better with 13.85% YTD performance, and +$327M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMET and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMET vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMET MOO | -3.24%+4.69% | -11.50%+0.51% | +3.86%+13.85% | +53.27%+14.63% | +44.94%+3.95% | n/a+2.55% |
| Flows | EMET MOO | -$4M+$20M | +$267K-$165M | +$752K+$327M | +$3M+$273M | +$1M-$58M | -+$129M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMET MOO | +42.90%+13.39% | +37.03%+13.38% | +31.55%+14.58% | n/a+16.46% |
| Max drawdown | EMET MOO | -22.93%-9.34% | -24.48%-10.98% | -39.33%-26.29% | n/a-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | EMET MOO | 75d83d | 148d158d | 478d910d | n/a1559d |
Trading data
EMET | MOO | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $83.88 | |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $83.00 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMET | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMET | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $83.88 |
| 1D performance | – | +1.06% |
| AuM | $32.71 M | $985.32 M |
| E/R | 0.62% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
EMET | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | VanEck |
| Benchmark | MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 11, 2021 | August 31, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EMET
Canada
18.81%
USA
16.47%
China
15.44%
United Kingdom
13.86%
Australia
7.51%
South Africa
7.27%
Other
20.65%
MOO
USA
52.47%
Germany
9.66%
Other
37.87%
Sectors
EMET
Non-Energy Materi.
99.45%
Other
0.55%
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
33.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
27.89%
Industrials
22.41%
Healthcare
16.13%
Other
0%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMET
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.15%
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
EMET
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
8.08%
Anglo American Plc
7.91%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
7.17%
Teck Resources Limited
6.42%
Antofagasta Plc
5.04%
Southern Copper Corp.
3.69%
Boliden AB
3.67%
Lundin Mining Corp.
3.32%
Valterra Platinum Ltd.
2.99%
Albemarle Corp.
2.93%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
2.92%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
2.54%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd.
2.32%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
2.10%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
2.05%
MOO
Bayer AG
8.82%
Deere & Co.
8.78%
Corteva, Inc.
8.78%
Nutrien Ltd.
5.99%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.30%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.10%
Kubota Corp.
4.76%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
4.46%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.25%
Bunge Global SA
3.44%
Mowi ASA
2.84%
CNH Industrial NV
2.61%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.49%
The Toro Co.
2.45%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.37%
Frequently asked questions about EMET and MOO
How have the EMET and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, EMET is up 3.86% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 13.85%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMET or MOO?
Year-to-date, the EMET ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to +$327M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMET or MOO?
Over the past year, EMET had a volatility of 37.03%, while MOO experienced 13.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMET or MOO?
As of July 27, 2026, EMET holds $32.71 M in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $985.32 M.
What sectors do the EMET and MOO ETFs invest in?
EMET leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the EMET ETF and MOO ETF?
EMET top holdings include Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.. MOO holds in its top three: Bayer AG, Deere & Co. and Corteva, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EMET or MOO?
EMET holds 57 securities with 63.15% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.43%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EMET & MOO
Advertisement
