EMETvsICOPETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF (EMET) belongs to the Natural Resources segment. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Non-Energy Materials. EMET is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.62%, versus 0.47% for ICOP. EMET is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$752K in YTD flows. ICOP performs better with 12.32% YTD performance, and +$241M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMET and ICOP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMET vs ICOP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMET ICOP | -4.38%+2.46% | -12.09%-4.02% | +3.42%+12.32% | +49.15%+63.63% | +45.99%+104.83% | n/an/a |
| Flows | EMET ICOP | -$4M-$5M | +$267K+$6M | +$752K+$241M | +$3M+$308M | +$1M+$371M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMET ICOP | +42.89%+45.80% | +37.00%+37.66% | +31.57%+32.87% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | EMET ICOP | -22.93%-19.42% | -24.48%-25.36% | -39.33%-37.39% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EMET ICOP | 72d52d | 145d96d | 478d478d | n/an/a |
Trading data
EMET | ICOP | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.41 | |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $49.84 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMET | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMET | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $49.41 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.87% |
| AuM | $32.57 M | $425.24 M |
| E/R | 0.62% | 0.47% |
Characteristics
EMET | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | iShares |
| Benchmark | MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index | STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 11, 2021 | June 23, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EMET
Canada
18.81%
USA
16.47%
China
15.44%
United Kingdom
13.86%
Australia
7.51%
South Africa
7.27%
Other
20.65%
ICOP
Canada
26.13%
United Kingdom
17.99%
Australia
17.4%
USA
15.77%
Mexico
7.99%
Other
14.72%
Sectors
EMET
Non-Energy Materi.
99.45%
Other
0.55%
ICOP
Non-Energy Materi.
95.45%
Other
4.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMET
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.15%
ICOP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.26%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
EMET
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
8.08%
Anglo American Plc
7.91%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
7.17%
Teck Resources Limited
6.42%
Antofagasta Plc
5.04%
Southern Copper Corp.
3.69%
Boliden AB
3.67%
Lundin Mining Corp.
3.32%
Valterra Platinum Ltd.
2.99%
Albemarle Corp.
2.93%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
2.92%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
2.54%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd.
2.32%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
2.10%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
2.05%
ICOP
BHP Group Ltd.
8.10%
Anglo American Plc
8.09%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
7.99%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
7.93%
Teck Resources Limited
5.39%
Rio Tinto Plc
5.16%
Evolution Mining Ltd.
4.96%
Antofagasta Plc
4.64%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.50%
Lundin Mining Corp.
4.36%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
4.26%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
3.70%
Barrick Mining Corp.
3.50%
Vale SA
3.38%
Newmont Corp.
3.30%
Frequently asked questions about EMET and ICOP
How have the EMET and ICOP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, EMET is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD), while ICOP has returned 12.32%. That puts ICOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMET or ICOP?
Year-to-date, the EMET ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to +$241M for ICOP.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMET or ICOP?
Over the past year, EMET had a volatility of 37%, while ICOP experienced 37.66%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMET or ICOP?
As of July 24, 2026, EMET holds $32.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while ICOP manages $425.24 M.
What sectors do the EMET and ICOP ETFs invest in?
EMET leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, ICOP focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EMET ETF and ICOP ETF?
EMET top holdings include Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.. ICOP holds in its top three: BHP Group Ltd., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V..
Which ETF is more diversified: EMET or ICOP?
EMET holds 57 securities with 63.15% of its assets in the top 15. ICOP has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.26%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EMET & ICOP
Advertisement
