EMETvsICOPETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF (EMET) belongs to the Natural Resources segment. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. EMET's top 1 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, ICOP's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. EMET is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.62%, versus 0.47% for ICOP. EMET is up 24.18% year-to-date (YTD) with +$752K in YTD flows. ICOP performs better with 34.19% YTD performance, and +$247M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMET and ICOP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMET vs ICOP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/08/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMET ICOP | +3.60%+5.52% | +9.16%+15.28% | +24.18%+34.19% | +67.65%+81.86% | +95.69%+164.07% | n/an/a |
| Flows | EMET ICOP | -+$9M | -$4M+$2M | +$752K+$247M | +$3M+$314M | -$2M+$378M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMET ICOP | +38.83%+39.64% | +38.28%+38.92% | +32.05%+33.23% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | EMET ICOP | -19.70%-16.72% | -24.48%-25.36% | -39.33%-37.39% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EMET ICOP | 65d64d | 191d96d | 478d478d | n/an/a |
Trading data
EMET | ICOP | |
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM | $58.83 | |
| Previous close 09/08/2026 | $58.95 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMET | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMET | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $58.83 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.20% |
| AuM | $39.11 M | $513.94 M |
| E/R | 0.62% | 0.47% |
Characteristics
EMET | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | iShares |
| Benchmark | MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index | STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 45 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 11, 2021 | June 23, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EMET
Canada
20.37%
USA
16.46%
United Kingdom
14.48%
China
13.51%
South Africa
7.83%
Mexico
7.7%
Other
19.64%
ICOP
Canada
26.72%
United Kingdom
17.8%
Australia
16.98%
USA
15.84%
Mexico
8.45%
Other
14.2%
Sectors
EMET
Non-Energy Materi.
100%
Other
-0%
ICOP
Non-Energy Materi.
96.23%
Other
3.77%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMET
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.83%
ICOP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.99%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EMET
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
8.37%
Anglo American Plc
8.36%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
7.70%
Teck Resources Limited
6.94%
Antofagasta Plc
5.15%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.07%
Lundin Mining Corp.
3.56%
Valterra Platinum Ltd.
3.37%
Boliden AB
3.36%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.12%
Albemarle Corp.
2.68%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd.
2.48%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
2.47%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
2.19%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
2.03%
ICOP
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
8.45%
Anglo American Plc
8.08%
BHP Group Ltd.
7.98%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
7.83%
Teck Resources Limited
5.53%
Rio Tinto Plc
5.17%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.67%
Evolution Mining Ltd.
4.62%
Antofagasta Plc
4.46%
Lundin Mining Corp.
4.45%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
4.25%
Barrick Mining Corp.
3.51%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
3.39%
Newmont Corp.
3.31%
Vale SA
3.29%
Frequently asked questions about EMET and ICOP
How have the EMET and ICOP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 8, 2026, EMET is up 24.18% year-to-date (YTD), while ICOP has returned 34.19%. That puts ICOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMET or ICOP?
Year-to-date, the EMET ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to +$247M for ICOP.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMET or ICOP?
Over the past year, EMET had a volatility of 38.28%, while ICOP experienced 38.92%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMET or ICOP?
As of September 8, 2026, EMET holds $39.11 M in assets under management (AUM), while ICOP manages $513.94 M.
What sectors do the EMET and ICOP ETFs invest in?
EMET leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, ICOP focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EMET ETF and ICOP ETF?
EMET top holdings include Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.. ICOP holds in its top three: Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V., Anglo American Plc and BHP Group Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: EMET or ICOP?
EMET holds 57 securities with 65.83% of its assets in the top 15. ICOP has 45 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.99%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EMET & ICOP
Advertisement
