EJANvsGPIXETF Comparison
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January (EJAN) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. EJAN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.35% for GPIX. EJAN is up 8.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$40M in YTD flows. GPIX performs better with 13.06% YTD performance, and +$3.36B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EJAN and GPIX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EJAN vs GPIX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EJAN GPIX | -0.26%+1.72% | +4.03%+2.41% | +8.94%+13.06% | +10.71%+17.41% | +34.00%n/a | +21.15%n/a |
| Flows | EJAN GPIX | -$3M+$469M | -$7M+$1.40B | +$40M+$3.36B | +$27M+$4.11B | -$169M- | +$3M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EJAN GPIX | +5.70%+9.12% | +8.39%+11.06% | +9.77%n/a | +11.64%n/a |
| Max drawdown | EJAN GPIX | -1.83%-2.24% | -6.65%-7.71% | -11.79%n/a | -20.09%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EJAN GPIX | 11d15d | 50d47d | 246dn/a | 994dn/a |
EJAN | GPIX | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.69 | $55.60 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $36.88 | $56.10 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
EJAN | GPIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.69 | $55.60 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.89% |
| AuM | $141.44 M | $6.22 B |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.35% |
EJAN | GPIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 1, 2020 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
