New

Turn ETF ideas into real portfolios. Try the builder now →

Advertisement

EFRAvsCGWETF Comparison

ETF 1
EFRA

iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF

This fund is part of
Infrastructure
+0.5%
VS
ETF 2
CGW

Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF

This fund is part of
Natural Resources
+0.75%

iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) belongs to the Infrastructure segment. Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) is part of the Natural Resources segment. EFRA's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. EFRA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.59% for CGW. EFRA is up 5.63% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 2.4% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFRA and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

EFRA vs CGW performance and flow charts

Performance

-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Cumulative Flows

0 M10 M20 M30 M40 MSep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
EFRA
CGW
+0.31%+1.78%
-2.64%-2.39%
+5.63%+2.40%
+5.57%+1.32%
+48.74%+45.35%
n/a+22.53%
Flows
EFRA
CGW
--$358K
--$358K
-+$41M
-+$46M
--$130M
--$200M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
EFRA
CGW
+12.07%+11.88%
+14.26%+13.06%
+14.42%+13.64%
n/a+15.73%
Max drawdown
EFRA
CGW
-7.16%-7.04%
-11.18%-10.52%
-16.05%-14.42%
n/a-32.65%
Max drawdown duration
EFRA
CGW
64d72d
229d232d
238d227d
n/a862d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
EFRA
CGW
Last sale
10/19/2026 at 6:15 PM
$34.60
$63.80
Previous close
10/16/2026
$34.73
$64.10
Consolidated volume
10/16/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
EFRA
CGW
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 6:15 PM
Live
Closed
EFRA
CGW
Last price
$34.60
$63.80
1D performance
-0.37%
-0.47%
AuM$5.56 M$1.04 B
E/R0.47%0.59%
Characteristics
EFRA
CGW
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProvideriSharesInvesco
BenchmarkFTSE Green Revenues Select Infrastructure and Industrials IndexS&P Global Water Index
N° of holdings8066
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateNovember 1, 2022May 14, 2007
ESGYesYes
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

EFRA
USA
49.15%
United Kingdom
10.27%
Japan
9.94%
Other
30.64%
CGW
USA
56.47%
United Kingdom
14.4%
Brazil
9.59%
Switzerland
7.03%
Other
12.51%

Sectors

EFRA
Industrials
44.32%
Utilities
24.6%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.39%
Business Services
10.57%
Other
6.13%
CGW
Utilities
45.36%
Industrials
35.72%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.65%
Other
3.28%
Advertisement

Diversification

EFRA

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

64.22%
CGW

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

67.56%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026
EFRA
Veralto Corp.
6.45%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
6.35%
Smurfit WestRock Plc
6.27%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
6.26%
Xylem, Inc.
5.81%
Veolia Environnement SA
5.34%
Clean Harbors, Inc.
4.27%
United Utilities Group Plc
3.86%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
3.12%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
3.03%
Severn Trent Plc
3.02%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
2.66%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
2.64%
Pentair plc
2.58%
Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) Ltd.
2.56%
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
8.20%
Xylem, Inc.
7.51%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
6.77%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.80%
United Utilities Group Plc
5.75%
Severn Trent Plc
5.19%
Veralto Corp.
4.77%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.12%
Geberit AG
3.81%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.44%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.35%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.42%
American States Water Co.
2.34%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.08%
California Water Service Group
2.02%
Frequently asked questions about EFRA and CGW

How have the EFRA and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 16, 2026, EFRA is up 5.63% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 2.4%. That puts EFRA better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFRA or CGW?

Year-to-date, the EFRA ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.

Which ETF is more volatile: EFRA or CGW?

Over the past year, EFRA had a volatility of 14.26%, while CGW experienced 13.06%.

Which ETF is bigger: EFRA or CGW?

As of October 16, 2026, EFRA holds $5.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.04 B.

What sectors do the EFRA and CGW ETFs invest in?

EFRA leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.

What are the top holdings of the EFRA ETF and CGW ETF?

EFRA top holdings include Veralto Corp., American Water Works Co., Inc. and Smurfit WestRock Plc. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.

Which ETF is more diversified: EFRA or CGW?

EFRA holds 80 securities with 64.22% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 66 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.56%.

Advertisement
Latest news about EFRA & CGW
Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

With 1,790 new products launched by July 2026, choosing is harder than ever. Our Global ETF Survey 2026, built on 620 professional investors and allocators, shows how active, fixed income, options-based and thematic ETFs are reshaping fund selection.

Global ETF Survey 2026