EFRAvsCGWETF Comparison
ETF 1
EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
This fund is part of
Infrastructure
+0.03%
VS
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) belongs to the Infrastructure segment. Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) is part of the Natural Resources segment. EFRA's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. EFRA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.59% for CGW. EFRA is up 6.58% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 2.16% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFRA and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFRA vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFRA CGW | -1.77%-1.59% | +2.37%+3.06% | +6.58%+2.16% | +7.69%+3.54% | +41.91%+35.07% | n/a+15.69% |
| Flows | EFRA CGW | -- | -+$15M | -+$41M | -+$26M | --$148M | --$171M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFRA CGW | +14.56%+13.31% | +14.45%+13.16% | +14.58%+13.81% | n/a+15.76% |
| Max drawdown | EFRA CGW | -4.11%-4.04% | -11.18%-10.52% | -16.05%-14.42% | n/a-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFRA CGW | 20d28d | 185d188d | 238d227d | n/a862d |
Trading data
EFRA | CGW | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.38 | $64.66 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $35.05 | $64.20 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFRA | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFRA | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.38 | $64.66 |
| 1D performance | +0.96% | +0.71% |
| AuM | $5.61 M | $1.04 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
EFRA | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | FTSE Green Revenues Select Infrastructure and Industrials Index | S&P Global Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 80 | 66 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 1, 2022 | May 14, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFRA
USA
48.99%
United Kingdom
10.2%
Japan
9.8%
Other
31.01%
CGW
USA
57.49%
United Kingdom
14.01%
Brazil
10.44%
Other
18.06%
Sectors
EFRA
Industrials
43.92%
Utilities
24.66%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.01%
Business Services
11.22%
Other
6.19%
CGW
Utilities
45.55%
Industrials
35.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.23%
Other
3.27%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFRA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
64.99%
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
68.16%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EFRA
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
6.41%
Smurfit WestRock Plc
6.38%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
6.31%
Veralto Corp.
6.23%
Xylem, Inc.
6.17%
Veolia Environnement SA
5.83%
Clean Harbors, Inc.
4.31%
United Utilities Group Plc
3.69%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
3.38%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
3.05%
Severn Trent Plc
2.89%
Pentair plc
2.84%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
2.67%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
2.50%
NGK Corp.
2.32%
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
8.35%
Xylem, Inc.
8.21%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.29%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.88%
United Utilities Group Plc
5.49%
Severn Trent Plc
4.99%
Veralto Corp.
4.83%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.13%
Geberit AG
3.43%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.36%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.13%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.60%
American States Water Co.
2.34%
California Water Service Group
2.10%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.03%
Frequently asked questions about EFRA and CGW
How have the EFRA and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, EFRA is up 6.58% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 2.16%. That puts EFRA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFRA or CGW?
Year-to-date, the EFRA ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFRA or CGW?
Over the past year, EFRA had a volatility of 14.45%, while CGW experienced 13.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFRA or CGW?
As of September 2, 2026, EFRA holds $5.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.04 B.
What sectors do the EFRA and CGW ETFs invest in?
EFRA leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EFRA ETF and CGW ETF?
EFRA top holdings include Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp., Smurfit WestRock Plc and American Water Works Co., Inc.. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFRA or CGW?
EFRA holds 80 securities with 64.99% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 66 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.16%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EFRA & CGW
Advertisement
