EFASvsBBCAETF Comparison
VS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF (EFAS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Telecommunications. In contrast, BBCA's top sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Non-Energy Materials. EFAS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.19% for BBCA. EFAS is up 17.89% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. BBCA performs worse with 11.23% YTD performance, and +$317M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAS and BBCA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAS vs BBCA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAS BBCA | +2.31%+2.40% | +3.44%+2.80% | +17.89%+11.23% | +31.15%+28.33% | +92.11%+77.62% | +95.82%+86.90% |
| Flows | EFAS BBCA | -+$86M | +$4M-$78M | +$8M+$317M | +$19M+$364M | +$28M+$547M | +$27M+$1.32B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAS BBCA | +9.40%+12.64% | +10.15%+13.62% | +12.34%+14.63% | +14.26%+16.58% |
| Max drawdown | EFAS BBCA | -3.54%-2.86% | -5.47%-8.26% | -10.99%-12.74% | -28.43%-24.42% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAS BBCA | 54d32d | 37d45d | 34d135d | 677d778d |
Trading data
EFAS | BBCA | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.25 | $102.59 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $22.04 | $102.47 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAS | BBCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFAS | BBCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.25 | $102.59 |
| 1D performance | +0.95% | +0.12% |
| AuM | $50.25 M | $10.85 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
EFAS | BBCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index | Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 76 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 14, 2016 | August 8, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAS
France
17.91%
United Kingdom
15.87%
Hong Kong
15.18%
Italy
12.21%
Norway
9.3%
Spain
7.94%
Other
21.6%
BBCA
Canada
97.57%
Other
2.43%
Sectors
EFAS
Finance
50.31%
Energy
15.1%
Telecommunication.
9.41%
Utilities
7.63%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.53%
Other
10.02%
BBCA
Finance
44.28%
Energy
18.34%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.38%
Industrials
7.11%
Other
15.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.07%
BBCA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
EFAS
Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA
2.14%
Land Securities Group Plc
2.12%
CaixaBank SA
2.10%
Banco BPM SpA
2.09%
Renault SA
2.09%
Stockland
2.09%
Svenska Handelsbanken AB
2.07%
Assicurazioni Generali SpA
2.06%
Poste Italiane SpA
2.06%
M&G Plc
2.06%
Covivio SA
2.05%
Legal & General Group Plc
2.04%
Sodexo SA
2.04%
Naturgy Energy Group SA
2.03%
Gecina SA
2.03%
BBCA
Royal Bank of Canada
8.93%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
6.34%
Shopify, Inc.
4.39%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.13%
Bank of Montreal
3.88%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.60%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.35%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
3.16%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.96%
Brookfield Corp.
2.84%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.
2.77%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.59%
TC Energy Corp.
2.38%
Barrick Mining Corp.
2.32%
Manulife Financial Corp.
2.20%
Frequently asked questions about EFAS and BBCA
How have the EFAS and BBCA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, EFAS is up 17.89% year-to-date (YTD), while BBCA has returned 11.23%. That puts EFAS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAS or BBCA?
Year-to-date, the EFAS ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to +$317M for BBCA.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAS or BBCA?
Over the past year, EFAS had a volatility of 10.15%, while BBCA experienced 13.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAS or BBCA?
As of July 17, 2026, EFAS holds $50.25 M in assets under management (AUM), while BBCA manages $10.85 B.
What sectors do the EFAS and BBCA ETFs invest in?
EFAS leans toward sectors like Finance, Energy and Telecommunications. Meanwhile, BBCA focuses on Finance, Energy and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EFAS ETF and BBCA ETF?
EFAS top holdings include Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, Land Securities Group Plc and CaixaBank SA. BBCA holds in its top three: Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank and Shopify, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAS or BBCA?
EFAS holds 50 securities with 31.07% of its assets in the top 15. BBCA has 77 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.84%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EFAS & BBCA
Advertisement
