EFADvsBBCAETF Comparison
VS
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EFAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, BBCA's top sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Non-Energy Materials. EFAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.19% for BBCA. EFAD is up 4.37% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. BBCA performs better with 11.23% YTD performance, and +$317M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFAD and BBCA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EFAD vs BBCA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFAD BBCA | +0.80%+2.40% | -0.66%+2.80% | +4.37%+11.23% | +6.03%+28.33% | +23.45%+77.62% | +5.33%+86.90% |
| Flows | EFAD BBCA | -+$86M | -$1M-$78M | -$3M+$317M | -$11M+$364M | -$42M+$547M | -$59M+$1.32B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFAD BBCA | +10.15%+12.64% | +11.87%+13.62% | +12.60%+14.63% | +13.68%+16.58% |
| Max drawdown | EFAD BBCA | -4.74%-2.86% | -9.95%-8.26% | -15.06%-12.74% | -35.77%-24.42% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFAD BBCA | 74d32d | 138d45d | 236d135d | 1633d778d |
Trading data
EFAD | BBCA | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.14 | $102.59 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $43.11 | $102.47 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EFAD | BBCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EFAD | BBCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.14 | $102.59 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | +0.12% |
| AuM | $61.69 M | $10.85 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
EFAD | BBCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Dividends Masters Index | Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index |
| N° of holdings | 75 | 76 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2014 | August 8, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EFAD
Japan
26.07%
United Kingdom
13.57%
Switzerland
12.11%
Australia
9.92%
Other
38.33%
BBCA
Canada
97.57%
Other
2.43%
Sectors
EFAD
Technology
23.07%
Healthcare
15.42%
Finance
15.01%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.93%
Industrials
7.94%
Utilities
7.59%
Other
19.05%
BBCA
Finance
44.28%
Energy
18.34%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.38%
Industrials
7.11%
Other
15.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
EFAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.63%
BBCA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
EFAD
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
2.55%
Logitech International SA
1.62%
London Stock Exchange Group Plc
1.60%
Lasertec Corp.
1.56%
Terumo Corp.
1.54%
Deutsche Börse AG
1.51%
Halma Plc
1.51%
ASML Holding NV
1.50%
Washington H. Soul Pattinson & Co. Ltd.
1.50%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.48%
APA Group
1.48%
Bunzl Plc
1.46%
Computershare Ltd.
1.45%
The Sage Group plc
1.43%
RELX Plc
1.42%
BBCA
Royal Bank of Canada
8.93%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
6.34%
Shopify, Inc.
4.39%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.13%
Bank of Montreal
3.88%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.60%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.35%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
3.16%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.96%
Brookfield Corp.
2.84%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.
2.77%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.59%
TC Energy Corp.
2.38%
Barrick Mining Corp.
2.32%
Manulife Financial Corp.
2.20%
Frequently asked questions about EFAD and BBCA
How have the EFAD and BBCA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, EFAD is up 4.37% year-to-date (YTD), while BBCA has returned 11.23%. That puts BBCA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFAD or BBCA?
Year-to-date, the EFAD ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$317M for BBCA.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFAD or BBCA?
Over the past year, EFAD had a volatility of 11.87%, while BBCA experienced 13.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFAD or BBCA?
As of July 17, 2026, EFAD holds $61.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while BBCA manages $10.85 B.
What sectors do the EFAD and BBCA ETFs invest in?
EFAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, BBCA focuses on Finance, Energy and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EFAD ETF and BBCA ETF?
EFAD top holdings include Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Logitech International SA and London Stock Exchange Group Plc. BBCA holds in its top three: Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank and Shopify, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EFAD or BBCA?
EFAD holds 75 securities with 23.63% of its assets in the top 15. BBCA has 77 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.84%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EFAD & BBCA
Advertisement
