DWSHvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.81%
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. DWSH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 6.66%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. DWSH is down -11.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$606K in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with 12.06% YTD performance, and +$300M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DWSH and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DWSH vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DWSH QDPL | +0.14%+1.34% | -2.83%+1.65% | -11.06%+12.06% | -11.91%+15.84% | -24.00%+73.85% | -16.75%+75.18% |
| Flows | DWSH QDPL | +$5M+$35M | +$5M+$119M | +$606K+$300M | -$24K+$420M | -$8M+$1.37B | -$10M+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DWSH QDPL | +23.27%+10.24% | +24.80%+11.68% | +24.41%+13.54% | +27.12%+15.34% |
| Max drawdown | DWSH QDPL | -14.48%-2.82% | -23.94%-8.32% | -36.42%-17.47% | -40.08%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | DWSH QDPL | 85d53d | 330d70d | 556d126d | 1475d704d |
Trading data
DWSH | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $5.74 | $45.95 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $5.71 | $46.38 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DWSH
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexDWSH | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
DWSH | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $5.74 | $45.95 |
| 1D performance | +0.53% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $10.95 M | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 6.66% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
DWSH | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 10, 2018 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DWSH
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
DWSH
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
DWSH
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
DWSH
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about DWSH and QDPL
How have the DWSH and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, DWSH is down -11.06% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 12.06%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DWSH or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the DWSH ETF saw +$606K in flows, compared to +$300M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: DWSH or QDPL?
Over the past year, DWSH had a volatility of 24.8%, while QDPL experienced 11.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: DWSH or QDPL?
As of October 16, 2026, DWSH holds $10.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.83 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about DWSH & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
