Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DFIVvsFNDFETF Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
DIMENSIONAL International Value ETF (DFIV) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. DFIV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Materials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FNDF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. DFIV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.27%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. DFIV is up 6.1% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.30B in YTD flows. FNDF performs better with 6.3% YTD performance, and +$581M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFIV and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DFIV vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFIV FNDF | -4.63%-5.46% | +7.81%+7.52% | +6.10%+6.30% | +39.56%+37.56% | +85.63%+75.95% | n/a+77.61% |
| Flows | DFIV FNDF | +$483M+$384M | +$1.56B+$579M | +$1.30B+$581M | +$4.80B+$2.05B | +$7.66B+$5.07B | -+$8.74B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFIV FNDF | +13.57%+16.41% | +14.67%+15.62% | +13.52%+13.59% | n/a+14.48% |
| Max drawdown | DFIV FNDF | -7.66%-9.15% | -14.39%-13.78% | -14.39%-13.78% | n/a-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | DFIV FNDF | 10d12d | 44d44d | 44d44d | n/a545d |
DFIV | FNDF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.62 | $47.97 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $52.19 | $48.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DFIV | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DFIV | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.62 | $47.97 |
| 1D performance | -1.09% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $18.05 B | $21.39 B |
| E/R | 0.27% | 0.25% |
DFIV | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 473 | 821 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 13, 2021 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DFIV and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DFIV is up 6.1% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 6.3%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFIV or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the DFIV ETF saw +$1.30B in flows, compared to +$581M for FNDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: DFIV or FNDF?
Over the past year, DFIV had a volatility of 14.67%, while FNDF experienced 15.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: DFIV or FNDF?
As of March 11, 2026, DFIV holds $18.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $21.39 B.
What sectors do the DFIV and FNDF ETFs invest in?
DFIV leans toward sectors like Financials, Materials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DFIV ETF and FNDF ETF?
DFIV top holdings include TOYOTA, BANCO SANTANDER SA and TOTALENERGIES SE. FNDF holds in its top three: SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: DFIV or FNDF?
DFIV holds 519 securities with 18.5% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 865 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.13%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
