Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DFARvsCREDETF Comparison
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) belong to the same industry segment: US Real Estate. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Real Estate. DFAR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 1.51% for CRED. DFAR is up 7.16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$71M in YTD flows. CRED performs worse with 7.11% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFAR and CRED below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DFAR vs CRED performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFAR CRED | -0.04%+0.76% | +7.11%+6.97% | +7.16%+7.11% | +7.35%+5.67% | +27.82%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | DFAR CRED | +$10M- | +$102M- | +$71M- | +$256M-$1K | +$874M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFAR CRED | +12.28%+12.70% | +16.16%+15.70% | +17.42%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | DFAR CRED | -3.63%-3.32% | -12.27%-11.18% | -17.73%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | DFAR CRED | 17d18d | 79d43d | 514dn/a | n/an/a |
DFAR | CRED | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.43 | $21.34 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $24.42 | $21.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DFAR | CRED | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DFAR | CRED | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.43 | $21.34 |
| 1D performance | +0.04% | +0.10% |
| AuM | $1.61 B | $3.22 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 1.51% |
DFAR | CRED | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | - | Beta Advantage Lionstone Research Enhanced REIT Index |
| N° of holdings | 121 | 66 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 23, 2022 | April 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DFAR and CRED ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DFAR is up 7.16% year-to-date (YTD), while CRED has returned 7.11%. That puts DFAR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFAR or CRED?
Year-to-date, the DFAR ETF saw +$71M in flows, compared to - for CRED.
Which ETF is more volatile: DFAR or CRED?
Over the past year, DFAR had a volatility of 16.16%, while CRED experienced 15.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: DFAR or CRED?
As of March 11, 2026, DFAR holds $1.61 B in assets under management (AUM), while CRED manages $3.22 M.
What sectors do the DFAR and CRED ETFs invest in?
DFAR leans toward sectors like Real Estate. Meanwhile, CRED focuses on Real Estate.
What are the top holdings of the DFAR ETF and CRED ETF?
DFAR top holdings include WELLTOWER INC, PROLOGIS REIT and AMERICAN TOWER CL A REIT. CRED holds in its top three: SIMON PROPERTY GROUP REIT, AMERICAN TOWER CL A REIT and EQUINIX INC COMMON STOCK REIT.
Which ETF is more diversified: DFAR or CRED?
DFAR holds 121 securities with 58.83% of its assets in the top 15. CRED has 66 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.33%.
Exploring Sector Rotation: Value vs. Growth
Real Estate Sector Declines on Fed Minutes
Real Estate Sector Suffers Third Weekly Loss Amid Rising Treasury Yields
Real Estate ETFs Hit Again by the Rise in Treasury Yields
Mortgage Funds Take a Nosedive
Mortgage Funds Take a Nosedive
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
