DFACvsJHMLETF Comparison
VS
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) belongs to the US All Cap segment. John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. DFAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.17%, versus 0.32% for JHML. DFAC is up 13.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3.09B in YTD flows. JHML performs worse with 12.75% YTD performance, and -$750K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFAC and JHML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DFAC vs JHML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFAC JHML | -1.75%-1.80% | +1.68%+1.01% | +13.91%+12.75% | +17.31%+16.09% | +71.06%+69.18% | +78.24%+73.41% |
| Flows | DFAC JHML | +$276M+$7M | +$1.05B-$11M | +$3.09B-$750K | +$4.04B-$55M | +$10.50B-$66M | +$17.79B-$24M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFAC JHML | +9.67%+9.83% | +12.50%+12.10% | +15.16%+14.32% | +17.34%+16.43% |
| Max drawdown | DFAC JHML | -3.82%-3.95% | -8.50%-7.93% | -20.02%-18.02% | -23.21%-23.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | DFAC JHML | 33d36d | 64d63d | 216d127d | 707d708d |
Trading data
DFAC | JHML | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.85 | $89.53 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $44.89 | $89.63 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DFAC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexDFAC | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
DFAC | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.85 | $89.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.09% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $48.75 B | $1.17 B |
| E/R | 0.17% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
DFAC | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | - | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 2496 | 762 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 4, 2007 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DFAC
USA
96.55%
Other
3.45%
JHML
USA
96.66%
Other
3.34%
Sectors
DFAC
Technology
32.47%
Finance
15.82%
Industrials
10.96%
Healthcare
9.87%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.25%
Other
21.63%
JHML
Technology
33.36%
Finance
17.01%
Industrials
11.13%
Healthcare
9.38%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.66%
Other
20.46%
Advertisement
Diversification
DFAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.98%
JHML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.57%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
DFAC
NVIDIA Corp.
5.27%
Apple, Inc.
5.12%
Microsoft Corp.
4.41%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.15%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.73%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.69%
Broadcom Inc.
1.18%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.09%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.09%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.09%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.05%
Johnson & Johnson
0.84%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.82%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.75%
Visa, Inc.
0.70%
JHML
Apple, Inc.
4.69%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.99%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.69%
Microsoft Corp.
2.65%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Broadcom Inc.
1.79%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.67%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.24%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.09%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.90%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.90%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.78%
Johnson & Johnson
0.76%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.72%
Frequently asked questions about DFAC and JHML
How have the DFAC and JHML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, DFAC is up 13.91% year-to-date (YTD), while JHML has returned 12.75%. That puts DFAC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFAC or JHML?
Year-to-date, the DFAC ETF saw +$3.09B in flows, compared to -$750K for JHML.
Which ETF is more volatile: DFAC or JHML?
Over the past year, DFAC had a volatility of 12.5%, while JHML experienced 12.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: DFAC or JHML?
As of September 18, 2026, DFAC holds $48.75 B in assets under management (AUM), while JHML manages $1.17 B.
What sectors do the DFAC and JHML ETFs invest in?
DFAC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, JHML focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the DFAC ETF and JHML ETF?
DFAC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. JHML holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: DFAC or JHML?
DFAC holds 2543 securities with 29.98% of its assets in the top 15. JHML has 770 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.57%.
Advertisement
Latest news about DFAC & JHML
Active ETFs See Strong Interest with Managers like Dimensional Fund Advisors Leading the Way
September 14, 2023
DFAC
The Most Popular Actively Managed ETFs of 2023
July 6, 2023
DFAC
Active ETFs gaining prominence
October 11, 2022
DFAC
Advertisement
Advertisement
