Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DFACvsJHMLETF Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) belongs to the US All Cap segment. John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. DFAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.17%, versus 0.32% for JHML. DFAC is up 0.86% year-to-date (YTD) with +$869M in YTD flows. JHML performs worse with -0.81% YTD performance, and +$22M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFAC and JHML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DFAC vs JHML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFAC JHML | -3.37%-2.77% | -0.37%-0.89% | +0.86%-0.81% | +22.96%+19.54% | +70.11%+67.83% | +67.42%+66.97% |
| Flows | DFAC JHML | +$435M+$20M | +$1.07B+$26M | +$869M+$22M | +$3.33B-$17M | +$10.56B-$38M | +$15.90B+$30M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFAC JHML | +11.83%+11.52% | +18.39%+17.54% | +15.30%+14.24% | +17.34%+16.32% |
| Max drawdown | DFAC JHML | -3.91%-4.36% | -14.07%-13.37% | -20.02%-18.02% | -23.21%-23.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | DFAC JHML | 30d31d | 46d45d | 216d127d | 707d708d |
DFAC | JHML | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.08 | $78.82 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $39.26 | $79.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DFAC | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DFAC | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.08 | $78.82 |
| 1D performance | -0.46% | -0.40% |
| AuM | $41.31 B | $1.05 B |
| E/R | 0.17% | 0.32% |
DFAC | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | - | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 2225 | 712 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 4, 2007 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DFAC and JHML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DFAC is up 0.86% year-to-date (YTD), while JHML has lost -0.81%. That puts DFAC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFAC or JHML?
Year-to-date, the DFAC ETF saw +$869M in flows, compared to +$22M for JHML.
Which ETF is more volatile: DFAC or JHML?
Over the past year, DFAC had a volatility of 18.39%, while JHML experienced 17.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: DFAC or JHML?
As of March 11, 2026, DFAC holds $41.31 B in assets under management (AUM), while JHML manages $1.05 B.
What sectors do the DFAC and JHML ETFs invest in?
DFAC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, JHML focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the DFAC ETF and JHML ETF?
DFAC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. JHML holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: DFAC or JHML?
DFAC holds 2294 securities with 30.22% of its assets in the top 15. JHML has 773 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.75%.
Active ETFs See Strong Interest with Managers like Dimensional Fund Advisors Leading the Way
The Most Popular Actively Managed ETFs of 2023
Active ETFs gaining prominence
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
