BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

DFACvsCLSEETF Comparison

ETF 1

DFAC

Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

This fund is part of

US All Cap

+0.29%

Full DFAC fund page

VS

ETF 2

CLSE

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF

This fund is part of

Alternatives

+0.22%

Full CLSE fund page

Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) belongs to the US All Cap segment. Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) is part of the Alternatives segment. DFAC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, CLSE's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. DFAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.17%, versus 1.44% for CLSE. DFAC is up 7.44% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.41B in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 14.81% YTD performance, and +$168M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFAC and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

DFAC vs CLSE performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 04/30/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	DFAC CLSE	+12.19%+9.76%	+4.51%+9.78%	+7.44%+14.81%	+32.58%+44.83%	+71.28%+114.90%	+71.10%n/a
Flows	DFAC CLSE	+$403M+$81M	+$1.09B+$138M	+$1.41B+$168M	+$3.71B+$227M	+$10.35B+$356M	+$16.44B-

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	DFAC CLSE	+15.28%+15.71%	+12.87%+12.47%	+15.29%+13.26%	+17.41%n/a
Max drawdown	DFAC CLSE	-8.50%-4.60%	-8.50%-4.60%	-20.02%-15.76%	-23.21%n/a
Max drawdown duration	DFAC CLSE	64d40d	64d40d	216d188d	707dn/a

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	DFAC	CLSE
Last sale 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM	$42.45	$31.42
Previous close 04/29/2026	$42.41	$31.29
Consolidated volume 04/29/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Main metrics

Last update 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	DFAC	CLSE
Last price	$42.45	$31.42
1D performance	+0.09%	+0.42%
AuM	$44.49 B	$489.42 M
E/R	0.17%	1.44%

Characteristics

	DFAC	CLSE
Management strategy	Active	Active
Provider	Dimensional	Convergence Investment Partners LLC
Benchmark	-	-
N° of holdings	2202	627
Asset class	-	-
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	October 4, 2007	February 22, 2022
ESG	No	No

More DFAC data on Trackinsight

More CLSE data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

DFAC

USA

92.77%

Other

7.23%

CLSE

Data will be available soon

Sectors

DFAC

Information Techn.

26.25%

Financials

12.96%

Industrials

12.4%

Consumer Discreti.

9.97%

Health Care

9.19%

Communication Ser.

8.19%

Other

21.04%

CLSE

Data will be available soon

Diversification

DFAC

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

28.88%

CLSE

Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of March 31, 2026

DFAC

NVIDIA

5.35%

APPLE

4.79%

MICROSOFT-T

3.86%

AMAZON.COM INC

2.60%

ALPHABET INC-CL

2.05%

META PLATFORMS

1.89%

ALPHABET INC-CL

1.52%

EXXON

1.06%

JPMORGAN CHASE

1.02%

JOHNSON&JOHNSON

0.95%

LILLY

0.93%

BERKSHIRE HATHWAY

0.78%

BROADCOM LIMITED

0.76%

CHEVRON TEXACO

0.65%

VISA INCORPORATION

0.65%

CLSE

Data will be available soon

Frequently asked questions about DFAC and CLSE

How have the DFAC and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 30, 2026, DFAC is up 7.44% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 14.81%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFAC or CLSE?

Year-to-date, the DFAC ETF saw +$1.41B in flows, compared to +$168M for CLSE.

Which ETF is more volatile: DFAC or CLSE?

Over the past year, DFAC had a volatility of 12.87%, while CLSE experienced 12.47%.

Which ETF is bigger: DFAC or CLSE?

As of April 30, 2026, DFAC holds $44.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $489.42 M.

What sectors do the DFAC and CLSE ETFs invest in?

DFAC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, CLSE focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.

DFACvsCLSEETF Comparison

Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF

DFAC vs CLSE performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the DFAC and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 30, 2026, DFAC is up 7.44% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 14.81%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFAC or CLSE?

Year-to-date, the DFAC ETF saw +$1.41B in flows, compared to +$168M for CLSE.

Which ETF is more volatile: DFAC or CLSE?

Over the past year, DFAC had a volatility of 12.87%, while CLSE experienced 12.47%.

Which ETF is bigger: DFAC or CLSE?

As of April 30, 2026, DFAC holds $44.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $489.42 M.

What sectors do the DFAC and CLSE ETFs invest in?

DFAC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, CLSE focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.

What are the top holdings of the DFAC ETF and CLSE ETF?

DFAC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. CLSE holds in its top three: NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and US5128073062.

Which ETF is more diversified: DFAC or CLSE?

DFAC holds 2272 securities with 28.88% of its assets in the top 15. CLSE has 673 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.42%.

Active ETFs See Strong Interest with Managers like Dimensional Fund Advisors Leading the Way

The Most Popular Actively Managed ETFs of 2023

Active ETFs gaining prominence

Build and Analyze Your ETF Portfolio Like a Pro