Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DFACvsAFLGETF Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) belongs to the US All Cap segment. First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. DFAC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, AFLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. DFAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.17%, versus 0.55% for AFLG. DFAC is up 0.86% year-to-date (YTD) with +$869M in YTD flows. AFLG performs worse with -0.08% YTD performance, and +$18M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFAC and AFLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DFAC vs AFLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFAC AFLG | -3.37%-2.45% | -0.37%-0.00% | +0.86%-0.08% | +22.96%+18.54% | +70.11%+75.83% | +67.42%+74.02% |
| Flows | DFAC AFLG | +$435M+$22M | +$1.07B+$24M | +$869M+$18M | +$3.33B+$229M | +$10.56B+$427M | +$15.90B+$425M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFAC AFLG | +11.83%+11.44% | +18.39%+17.23% | +15.30%+14.15% | +17.34%+16.21% |
| Max drawdown | DFAC AFLG | -3.91%-4.32% | -14.07%-12.96% | -20.02%-17.58% | -23.21%-23.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | DFAC AFLG | 30d15d | 46d45d | 216d205d | 707d741d |
DFAC | AFLG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.08 | $38.90 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $39.26 | $39.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
DFAC | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.08 | $38.90 |
| 1D performance | -0.46% | -0.62% |
| AuM | $41.31 B | $481.41 M |
| E/R | 0.17% | 0.55% |
DFAC | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Dimensional | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 2225 | 235 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 4, 2007 | December 3, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DFAC and AFLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DFAC is up 0.86% year-to-date (YTD), while AFLG has lost -0.08%. That puts DFAC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFAC or AFLG?
Year-to-date, the DFAC ETF saw +$869M in flows, compared to +$18M for AFLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: DFAC or AFLG?
Over the past year, DFAC had a volatility of 18.39%, while AFLG experienced 17.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: DFAC or AFLG?
As of March 11, 2026, DFAC holds $41.31 B in assets under management (AUM), while AFLG manages $481.41 M.
What sectors do the DFAC and AFLG ETFs invest in?
DFAC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, AFLG focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the DFAC ETF and AFLG ETF?
DFAC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. AFLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: DFAC or AFLG?
DFAC holds 2294 securities with 30.22% of its assets in the top 15. AFLG has 245 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.87%.
Active ETFs See Strong Interest with Managers like Dimensional Fund Advisors Leading the Way
The Most Popular Actively Managed ETFs of 2023
Active ETFs gaining prominence
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
