Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DBJPvsNBJPETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. DBJP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, NBJP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. DBJP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 1.92% for NBJP. DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$120M in YTD flows. NBJP performs better with 8.16% YTD performance, and +$63M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBJP and NBJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DBJP vs NBJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBJP NBJP | -5.33%-6.05% | +8.61%+8.39% | +7.81%+8.16% | +42.40%+38.98% | +116.81%n/a | +143.93%n/a |
| Flows | DBJP NBJP | +$27M+$27M | +$120M+$63M | +$120M+$63M | +$64M+$90M | +$104M- | +$137M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBJP NBJP | +23.04%+21.62% | +23.16%+19.95% | +21.48%n/a | +19.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown | DBJP NBJP | -9.16%-8.87% | -18.53%-13.15% | -25.81%n/a | -25.81%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | DBJP NBJP | 9d9d | 63d33d | 350dn/a | 350dn/a |
DBJP | NBJP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $102.39 | $33.33 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $102.78 | $33.64 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DBJP | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DBJP | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.39 | $33.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -0.91% |
| AuM | $590.26 M | $120.57 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 1.92% |
DBJP | NBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | Neuberger Berman |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 179 | 57 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 8, 2011 | September 12, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DBJP and NBJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD), while NBJP has returned 8.16%. That puts NBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBJP or NBJP?
Year-to-date, the DBJP ETF saw +$120M in flows, compared to +$63M for NBJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBJP or NBJP?
Over the past year, DBJP had a volatility of 23.16%, while NBJP experienced 19.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBJP or NBJP?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP holds $590.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while NBJP manages $120.57 M.
What sectors do the DBJP and NBJP ETFs invest in?
DBJP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, NBJP focuses on Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the DBJP ETF and NBJP ETF?
DBJP top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. NBJP holds in its top three: MIZUHO FINANCIAL, UACJ CORP and SUMITOMO REALTY.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBJP or NBJP?
DBJP holds 182 securities with 36.31% of its assets in the top 15. NBJP has 58 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.06%.
Ask the Manager: Kei Okamura Breaks Down Japan’s Investment Case
The Two Sides of the Magnificent Seven Sword
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
