CTEXvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. CTEX's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Utilities. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. CTEX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.52% for NLR. CTEX is down -7.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$35K in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with -7.79% YTD performance, and +$890M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CTEX and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CTEX vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CTEX NLR | -8.12%-4.16% | -22.60%-5.26% | -7.68%-7.79% | +19.97%-5.22% | +22.48%+84.30% | n/a+129.76% |
| Flows | CTEX NLR | --$47M | --$232M | +$35K+$890M | +$3M+$2.09B | +$487K+$3.98B | -+$4.04B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CTEX NLR | +47.02%+36.61% | +46.98%+39.48% | +42.71%+32.61% | n/a+27.65% |
| Max drawdown | CTEX NLR | -31.26%-19.34% | -39.02%-36.67% | -45.08%-36.67% | n/a-36.67% |
| Max drawdown duration | CTEX NLR | 81d82d | 101d226d | 721d226d | n/a226d |
Trading data
CTEX | NLR | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.48 | $109.47 |
| Previous close 09/11/2026 | $32.47 | $113.22 |
| Consolidated volume 09/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CTEX | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CTEX | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.48 | $109.47 |
| 1D performance | -3.03% | -3.31% |
| AuM | $4.89 M | $3.98 B |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.52% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CTEX
USA
76.48%
Other
23.52%
NLR
USA
51.08%
Canada
18.8%
Australia
7.41%
Other
22.71%
Sectors
CTEX
Industrials
60.84%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.56%
Utilities
10.5%
Technology
8.36%
Other
5.74%
NLR
Energy
39.26%
Utilities
31.2%
Industrials
23.85%
Other
5.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
CTEX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.4%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
83.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CTEX
Arcosa, Inc.
5.50%
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
5.50%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
4.49%
GE Vernova, Inc.
4.35%
First Solar, Inc.
4.11%
Canadian Solar, Inc.
3.86%
ReNew Energy Global Plc
3.67%
Nextpower, Inc.
3.62%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
3.61%
Generac Holdings, Inc.
3.58%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
3.51%
Hyster-Yale, Inc.
3.50%
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
3.47%
Sunrun, Inc.
3.36%
Valmont Industries, Inc.
3.27%
NLR
Constellation Energy Corp.
9.13%
Cameco Corp.
7.79%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
7.24%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
6.17%
Fortum Oyj
5.91%
Centrus Energy Corp.
5.69%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
5.27%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.88%
Denison Mines Corp.
4.87%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.61%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
4.53%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.45%
Oklo, Inc.
4.39%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.37%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.04%
Frequently asked questions about CTEX and NLR
How have the CTEX and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, CTEX is down -7.68% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -7.79%. That puts CTEX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CTEX or NLR?
Year-to-date, the CTEX ETF saw +$35K in flows, compared to +$890M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: CTEX or NLR?
Over the past year, CTEX had a volatility of 46.98%, while NLR experienced 39.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: CTEX or NLR?
As of September 11, 2026, CTEX holds $4.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $3.98 B.
What sectors do the CTEX and NLR ETFs invest in?
CTEX leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Utilities. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CTEX ETF and NLR ETF?
CTEX top holdings include Arcosa, Inc., FuelCell Energy, Inc. and Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.. NLR holds in its top three: Constellation Energy Corp., Cameco Corp. and Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CTEX or NLR?
CTEX holds 30 securities with 59.4% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 83.33%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CTEX & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
Looking for a way to invest in clean tech?
September 21, 2022
CTEX
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
NLR
Advertisement
