CTECvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. CTEC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Utilities, Energy and Industrials. CTEC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.52% for NLR. CTEC is up 6.32% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with -15.64% YTD performance, and +$1.00B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CTEC and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CTEC vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CTEC NLR | -15.34%-16.38% | -9.68%-28.71% | +6.32%-15.64% | +40.80%-7.46% | -24.53%+86.71% | -37.16%+128.19% |
| Flows | CTEC NLR | --$82M | -+$113M | -$3M+$1.00B | -$6M+$2.65B | -$39M+$4.12B | -$49M+$4.15B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CTEC NLR | +40.13%+38.11% | +34.83%+37.85% | +32.67%+31.59% | +33.31%+26.84% |
| Max drawdown | CTEC NLR | -27.22%-29.50% | -27.22%-35.69% | -64.76%-35.69% | -75.67%-35.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | CTEC NLR | 45d72d | 45d170d | 1039d170d | 1719d170d |
Trading data
CTEC | NLR | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $56.46 | $104.20 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $56.40 | $104.67 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CTEC | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CTEC | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $56.46 | $104.20 |
| 1D performance | +0.11% | -0.45% |
| AuM | $24.89 M | $3.74 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.52% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CTEC
USA
44.07%
China
11.61%
Republic of Korea
11.21%
Other
33.11%
NLR
USA
50%
Canada
17.05%
Australia
7.25%
Other
25.71%
Sectors
CTEC
Industrials
82.52%
Technology
8.54%
Other
8.94%
NLR
Utilities
37.99%
Energy
36.32%
Industrials
21.87%
Other
3.83%
Advertisement
Diversification
CTEC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.98%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
CTEC
Bloom Energy Corp.
8.25%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
7.69%
First Solar, Inc.
7.06%
Nextpower, Inc.
6.14%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
5.53%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
5.47%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
5.18%
Plug Power, Inc.
3.66%
NIBE Industrier AB
3.61%
QuantumScape Corp.
3.43%
Nordex SE
3.26%
Johnson Matthey Plc
3.20%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
3.06%
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.
2.77%
Doosan Fuel Cell Co., Ltd.
2.64%
NLR
Cameco Corp.
8.12%
Constellation Energy Corp.
8.07%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
6.46%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
5.94%
Oklo, Inc.
5.17%
PG&E Corp.
5.15%
Fortum Oyj
4.81%
CEZ as
4.70%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.56%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.41%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.38%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.32%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
4.26%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.17%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
4.14%
Frequently asked questions about CTEC and NLR
How have the CTEC and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, CTEC is up 6.32% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -15.64%. That puts CTEC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CTEC or NLR?
Year-to-date, the CTEC ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$1.00B for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: CTEC or NLR?
Over the past year, CTEC had a volatility of 34.83%, while NLR experienced 37.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: CTEC or NLR?
As of July 17, 2026, CTEC holds $24.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $3.74 B.
What sectors do the CTEC and NLR ETFs invest in?
CTEC leans toward sectors like Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Utilities, Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CTEC ETF and NLR ETF?
CTEC top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and First Solar, Inc.. NLR holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Constellation Energy Corp. and BWX Technologies, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CTEC or NLR?
CTEC holds 40 securities with 70.98% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.67%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CTEC & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
NLR
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
NLR
Advertisement
